Because there are plenty of articles that mention graphene as a standard, though experimental, adjuvant, and that information from the university in Spain confirms that graphene is an unlisted ingredient. That all seems to make sense and feels consistent. Since graphene can gain some magnetism in the presence of iron oxide, it makes sense.
People in general don't know how to rationalize self-assembling magnetite. There is very little believable data. Would love some sources.
Graphene is also a good carrier for magnetite. It is reasonable for all of this to be linked. I'm also looking for the pieces of data. Youtube is not sciencey enough for me to use as a source.
I get like a bazillion hits on this topic. Unfortunately there isn't a direct strong statement. The magnetism is often incidental. Graphene is a generally good carrier material.
Thank you. I will note the following: 1. graphene can be a carrier for magnetite, and so the composite would have some magnetic properties in that, in a field, the graphene could moved by the magnetite it contains as a cage. 2. The presence of magnetite however does not alter the electronic atomic properties of the carbon (magnetism effects in matter depend mostly on how the outer shell electrons are bound). It gets more complicated when we start to consider moving positive charge (protons); in an atom the magnetic effects of positive and negative charge tend to cancel out as far as magnetomotor forces are concerned. Otherwise everything would be magnetic)
Ah - on rereading the paper it seems like the presence of the magnetite probably alters the outer electrons on the oxygen in the graphene oxide. That might make the system more magnetic. And i nth lab preparation they used permanent magnets to easily separate out the GO-magnetite.
Why is the assumption graphene and not self-assembling magnetite?
Because there are plenty of articles that mention graphene as a standard, though experimental, adjuvant, and that information from the university in Spain confirms that graphene is an unlisted ingredient. That all seems to make sense and feels consistent. Since graphene can gain some magnetism in the presence of iron oxide, it makes sense.
People in general don't know how to rationalize self-assembling magnetite. There is very little believable data. Would love some sources.
Then you're talking about self-assembling magnetite through iron oxide, not graphene. Where is your data?
The magnetic vaccine has luciferase that is held by magnetite formed through iron oxide.
https://youtu.be/SIIes052B4E
Graphene is also a good carrier for magnetite. It is reasonable for all of this to be linked. I'm also looking for the pieces of data. Youtube is not sciencey enough for me to use as a source.
<graphene can gain some magnetism in the presence of iron oxide>
Are there any available citations showing that?
I get like a bazillion hits on this topic. Unfortunately there isn't a direct strong statement. The magnetism is often incidental. Graphene is a generally good carrier material.
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2012/ra/c2ra20885g#!divAbstract
Thank you. I will note the following: 1. graphene can be a carrier for magnetite, and so the composite would have some magnetic properties in that, in a field, the graphene could moved by the magnetite it contains as a cage. 2. The presence of magnetite however does not alter the electronic atomic properties of the carbon (magnetism effects in matter depend mostly on how the outer shell electrons are bound). It gets more complicated when we start to consider moving positive charge (protons); in an atom the magnetic effects of positive and negative charge tend to cancel out as far as magnetomotor forces are concerned. Otherwise everything would be magnetic) Ah - on rereading the paper it seems like the presence of the magnetite probably alters the outer electrons on the oxygen in the graphene oxide. That might make the system more magnetic. And i nth lab preparation they used permanent magnets to easily separate out the GO-magnetite.
Because the mRNA treatments are filled with graphene. Regardless, magnetism is a clear side effect of the 'vaccines'.
Graphene is not normally magnetic, except in a very specific configuration. It's all very odd. I wonder if it has to do with the Darpa program https://www.newsweek.com/covid-microchip-inject-pentagon-fact-check-real-hoax-1583532
I am highly sceptical of that claim.