That's not "an alternative example"... that's you making up shit that no one on earth does.
It's as dumb as saying "well one way to drive a car is by filling it with bees and blindfolding yourself, you can drive in public this way, too!!!"
You must be a product of common core.
lmao holy shit, this is clearly them trying to inject uncertainty with this stupid comparison that they KNOW will fool millions of dipshits into thinking this is a valid explanation.
Can somebody explain the order of operations to me?
Here is the math problem: 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1...
I forget, do I add 1 first, or do I add 1 and then go back and add 1?
If anybody doesn't get the sarcasm here, I'm just confused why public officials are admitting to the crimes of multiplying votes and dividing ballots.
If Biden gets to far ahead? I guarantee you that wasn't a problem on election night
Gotcha, I took it as counting actual ballots 😉
Right? Are they admitting to a weighted voting system? How corrupt must ones mind be, to think this can be a valid defense for a public election?
You wait until 3 am and add lots of 1's to the potato side.
There is no order of operations when dealing solely with addition.
Commutative Property, yup.
To bad counting ballots is addition.
By following the order of operations
(6,5)÷3+11=
We find the correct answer is 21
However, if you don't know the operations, but instead you just do the problem from left to right
6×5÷3+11 =
You'll end up coming up with 21 which is the wron- wait a minute...
They're so fucking stupid that they can't even come up with a good illustration of their point.
if you work outside in you get 30 ÷ 14
Outside in is a perfectly valid order.
Math doesn't have "an order", it has orders you can choose from.
E. G. 6 5 x 3 ÷ 11 +
Also yields 21
You're so hilariously wrong and you think you're so clever.
Mid Wit
You're retarded. "But if you throw in an extra 5x multiplier in this random spot, the answer will be different!!!"
If by "retarded" you mean professional data scientist who specialises in symbolic manipulation then you're spot on.
Why would you work "outside in" when that's not how you would ever do a math problem, and is not the order or operations...
I didn't say it was a good idea, I was just providing an alternative example.
That's not "an alternative example"... that's you making up shit that no one on earth does. It's as dumb as saying "well one way to drive a car is by filling it with bees and blindfolding yourself, you can drive in public this way, too!!!" You must be a product of common core.
This thread is hilarious 😂
Justin Amash said basically the same thing.
If they are multiplying groups of votes by a certain factor, like x0.8 or x1.2, sure...
$cience...
I think those are occultic numbers.
lmao holy shit, this is clearly them trying to inject uncertainty with this stupid comparison that they KNOW will fool millions of dipshits into thinking this is a valid explanation.
Isn't that the exact order of operations?
Let's see.... if i have 10 ballots does it matter if i count them off the top or off the bottom? Wouldn't I still have 10 ballots?
so f***ing disingenuous! Only trying to confuse the dumbasses more that might believe her bullshit
2 + 2 = 5 time
No Winston, I am holding up 4 fingers not 3.
my hearts last thread of love & hope will shrivel into a dark, twisted nightmare if they pull the "well, some numbers are racist" card.
21
Multiply divide add subtract - MDAS. No mystery there