How do we even know that COVID exists? Because the TV said so? Sorry, but I'm just not buying it. It's the normal flu that has been re-labeled. No extra deaths in 2020 during a "pandemic" proves this.
We are being lied to yes. There are symptoms, leading to death or not, unexplained by any other flu or cold. This is reported everywhere, by both whistleblowers and normies working in healthcare, as well as patients.
If you have no personal experience with any of this, good for you. You can't handwave it away.
It's not a pandemic. Our health authorities have lied to us in the effort to kill as many of us as possible as well as trying to destroy the US.
We know diseases exist as a general term. Some are external and some are internal issues. We don't know if viruses really do. Is a good question what is actually the cause.
You can't discover virus because you can't test for it. Viruses are too small for any optical microscopy, and there is no proven DNA evidence except in silico which is latin for "i guessed using a computer".
Look at horse suppliers. Cheap, OTC. Horses have a delicate constitution, totally safe for us. Careful with dosing! (I've done this to great effect, it's not some armchair idiot saying "you try it first")
Also made in a form designed for dogs. They can eat anything, stay away.
HCQ was (theoretically) available via America's Frontline Doctors. I procrastinated on that too and their website got pulled.
I should add that there is no test where they have "reinfected" someone or something else using tissue from someone who has tested positive. This includes animal/bat tests. If I found such a test of course the bar for believable evidence would be damn high.
I forget the name of the 1900 scientist you're drawing from, but all of his ideas have been replaced. There's not an ethical way to implement your suggestion, for one. Of course it's not ethical to deny sick people medicine. Everything done is a violation of ethics!
My vote is on FAKE. Oh, there's a virus. And people have died from it. Beyond that? Every number you've seen is FAKE.
How do we even know that COVID exists? Because the TV said so? Sorry, but I'm just not buying it. It's the normal flu that has been re-labeled. No extra deaths in 2020 during a "pandemic" proves this.
You are being lied to.
Women did this to us.
We are being lied to yes. There are symptoms, leading to death or not, unexplained by any other flu or cold. This is reported everywhere, by both whistleblowers and normies working in healthcare, as well as patients.
If you have no personal experience with any of this, good for you. You can't handwave it away.
It's not a pandemic. Our health authorities have lied to us in the effort to kill as many of us as possible as well as trying to destroy the US.
We know diseases exist as a general term. Some are external and some are internal issues. We don't know if viruses really do. Is a good question what is actually the cause.
Ok, looking at it that way, autopsy on people dead supposedly of wuflu discovers blood clots, not virus. No wonder WHO forbade autopsy, right?
Btw Ivermectin clears out the clotting and junk, at least if taken early.
You can't discover virus because you can't test for it. Viruses are too small for any optical microscopy, and there is no proven DNA evidence except in silico which is latin for "i guessed using a computer".
False. Electron microscopes exist. The issue is these are not used on all patients, or anything but a tiny sample.
Look at horse suppliers. Cheap, OTC. Horses have a delicate constitution, totally safe for us. Careful with dosing! (I've done this to great effect, it's not some armchair idiot saying "you try it first")
Also made in a form designed for dogs. They can eat anything, stay away.
HCQ was (theoretically) available via America's Frontline Doctors. I procrastinated on that too and their website got pulled.
I should add that there is no test where they have "reinfected" someone or something else using tissue from someone who has tested positive. This includes animal/bat tests. If I found such a test of course the bar for believable evidence would be damn high.
I forget the name of the 1900 scientist you're drawing from, but all of his ideas have been replaced. There's not an ethical way to implement your suggestion, for one. Of course it's not ethical to deny sick people medicine. Everything done is a violation of ethics!