https://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU?t=29 Yeah. He said they made the decision to pull, then they watched the building collapse. The 'debunkers' just turned it around and they he was only talking about pulling the fire fighters out of the building. But with this guy saying the building was deliberately imploded .. debunkers are no where to be seen.
i'll never forgot watching on one of those mainstream media channels literally on the afternoon of 9/11... they had on the ex president or ex prime minister of Israel and he went through and said the narrative of Bin laden ... and went through exactly what invasions and wars would happen over the next 15 years.... the video has of course been scrubbed from the internet.
It is not the exact interview I remember but it is close. Bibi must have been doing a media tour summoning the US to go to war with the "terrorist empire"
I think it did pancake but it was probably rebar (concrete reinforced with steel mesh) as apposed to a steel framed construction. The latter being much stronger.
When I was watching it live, I thought the same thing. I saw the way the WTC was coming down and knew that only controlled demolition would cause it to fall like that.
The news caster on whatever channel I was watching live on thought the same thing and said that (paraphrasing)" they must have set detonators so that it won't fall on the surrounding buildings" mirroring my own thoughts. when I saw 7 go down I thought the same thing.
I was in such disbelief watching the whole thing, it was totally surreal to me. I had walked by those buildings a million times. I had a view of them from my apartment, I had been to parties at W.O.W. (windows of the world) the restaurant/bar on the top floor multiple times and been to parties at hotels across the street looking at those buildings. I was in California when they came down though but it was so strange and sirreal to see them fall that I made excuses for what I saw rather than accusations.
It was not until weeks later that I heard that they supposedly fell like that naturally. At that point I knew it was in inside job, not to mention the way GBJr and the entire republican voter base was acting.
Once I heard the narrative I immediately knew it was bull shit that those buildings would fall like that without a controlled demo. They were constantly swaying 3 ft in any direction at the top. There is no way something that is swaying that much in the wind is going to go straight down, let alone building ls never do anyway, let alone two of them at once.
What's weird about this video is that it fails to show that video of the back side of the building. Apparently part of one of the towers fell on it, because the slash into the core started at the roof, and went all the way down to the 1st or 2nd floor. It was major, major damage, and there was a raging fire in the core.
Not that it would have fallen in such an even manner from that damage. Would have been awkward if the damage had disabled their explosives setup.
Did you read what I wrote? My position is that all three buildings at the WTC were demolished on purpose and did not fall as a result of the crashes. How is that salvaging the official narrative at all?
even silverstein said it that week... any 10th grade physics student knows all 3 same same... but that debilitating hive mind....
https://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU?t=29 Yeah. He said they made the decision to pull, then they watched the building collapse. The 'debunkers' just turned it around and they he was only talking about pulling the fire fighters out of the building. But with this guy saying the building was deliberately imploded .. debunkers are no where to be seen.
i'll never forgot watching on one of those mainstream media channels literally on the afternoon of 9/11... they had on the ex president or ex prime minister of Israel and he went through and said the narrative of Bin laden ... and went through exactly what invasions and wars would happen over the next 15 years.... the video has of course been scrubbed from the internet.
Would you happen to remember what channel it was? Could you even narrow it down? There are broadcast archive services.
I found this after some serious searching:
https://archive.org/details/911/day/20010913#id/WRC_20010913_200000_News_4_at_4/start/20:20:26UTC
It is not the exact interview I remember but it is close. Bibi must have been doing a media tour summoning the US to go to war with the "terrorist empire"
Wow! It's really incredible that you found this. Look how he names so many of his enemies as being responsible for 9/11.
If we had a functional media this would have been a huge story.
our media functions as designed,
Which is, as a propaganda organ
All three buildings already had explosives in them before that day. The towers had explosives on every level that went downward quickly.
I think it did pancake but it was probably rebar (concrete reinforced with steel mesh) as apposed to a steel framed construction. The latter being much stronger.
When I was watching it live, I thought the same thing. I saw the way the WTC was coming down and knew that only controlled demolition would cause it to fall like that.
The news caster on whatever channel I was watching live on thought the same thing and said that (paraphrasing)" they must have set detonators so that it won't fall on the surrounding buildings" mirroring my own thoughts. when I saw 7 go down I thought the same thing.
I was in such disbelief watching the whole thing, it was totally surreal to me. I had walked by those buildings a million times. I had a view of them from my apartment, I had been to parties at W.O.W. (windows of the world) the restaurant/bar on the top floor multiple times and been to parties at hotels across the street looking at those buildings. I was in California when they came down though but it was so strange and sirreal to see them fall that I made excuses for what I saw rather than accusations. It was not until weeks later that I heard that they supposedly fell like that naturally. At that point I knew it was in inside job, not to mention the way GBJr and the entire republican voter base was acting.
Once I heard the narrative I immediately knew it was bull shit that those buildings would fall like that without a controlled demo. They were constantly swaying 3 ft in any direction at the top. There is no way something that is swaying that much in the wind is going to go straight down, let alone building ls never do anyway, let alone two of them at once.
What's weird about this video is that it fails to show that video of the back side of the building. Apparently part of one of the towers fell on it, because the slash into the core started at the roof, and went all the way down to the 1st or 2nd floor. It was major, major damage, and there was a raging fire in the core.
Not that it would have fallen in such an even manner from that damage. Would have been awkward if the damage had disabled their explosives setup.
Of course the demolition was planned ahead of time. For them not to do that would be malfeasance.
Give it up. The official 9/11 narrative isn’t salvageable, and any attempts to salvage it just make you look like a shill or a dupe.
Did you read what I wrote? My position is that all three buildings at the WTC were demolished on purpose and did not fall as a result of the crashes. How is that salvaging the official narrative at all?