Self sustenance as form within flow aka comprehending being ONE (potential) within ALL (potentiality); which leads to the comprehension of ALL being ONE in energy aka the ONEness of ALL.
That would put me on pedestal; which would restrict my actions to those who put me there aka the cult of personality that worships me as their idol.
I rather stick to free will of choice for the sustenance of self.
Hey word-salad bot.
What are the implications of addressing a perceived "bot"? How about you perceive what you read as a potential you lack to comprehend; while trying to adapt to any aspect of it that you comprehend?
Isn't there one line in there that you understand?
Answer for those your salad isn't percieved as 42. It is "whatever" :)
You write too much making yourself organic bullshit generator rather.
Why anybody would understand person who just uses not proper words, and uses really symbolism but in text not in symbol or graph (try dia). Not to mention those things you promote are shallow part of reality despite its worth - promoting individualism - really. Solipsism is probably wrong as there are too many independent and unwanted things so it is rather wrong to claim "all in one"/"all is one"...
You write too much making yourself organic bullshit generator
What if I write for the sustenance of self and not for others?
person who just uses not proper words
Show me where nature uses words to communicate to our perception? Why is it that other lifeforms can perceive; comprehend and act upon "grass" without anyone telling them that it's properly called "grass"?
uses really symbolism
How can I use symbol-ISM; while calling out all -isms as suggestions towards the ignorance of free will?
SYM'BOL, noun [Latin symbolum; Gr. with, and to throw; to compare.] Form is "with"in flow; flow "throws" form into its momentum; form "compares" itself to perceived inspiration by flow.
but in text not in symbol or graph
So you want pictures and less text? Are you a smartphone user?
(try dia)
DIA, - "Greek, a prefix, denotes through"...as form I already act "through" flow.
those things you promote
Look at my post count (0)...I don't offer; I adapt to inspiration for the sustenance of self.
shallow part of reality despite its worth
ALL value is predefined within flow; while the ONEs within form hold the temporary free will of choice to evaluate it ALL.
promoting individualism
Consenting to the suggested -ism; deceives the individual ONE to ignore free will of choice for the suggestion (-ism) made by the free will of another ONE.
Free will of choice does not equal individual-ISM; it represents the sole authority over ONEself (form) within ALL (flow), and consenting to any suggested -isms ignores that.
Solipsism is probably wrong...
Yet another -ism you consented to; while propagating it to others (even when in doubt about it). Ask yourself this...does nature offer "wrong" information to our senses?
independent
INDEPEND'ENT, adjective [in and dependent.] - "not dependent; not subject to control"...as life (form) are you not subjected to the movement from inception towards death (flow)?
unwanted things
Want represents the choice to ignore need (sustenance of life) for temptation luring towards death. Does it matter if life does "not want" death for death to reclaim life?
it is rather wrong to claim "all in one"/"all is one"...
Correct; which is why I state to use implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false). When you say "wrong" you imply believing in "true"; which is why you judge what others write through the conflict of reason (true vs false).
Try implication and stay clear of reason and you will not find yourself in a conflict. So if "ALL is ONE in energy"; then everything moves...now adapt to what this inspires you to do and keep using implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
Self sustenance as form within flow aka comprehending being ONE (potential) within ALL (potentiality); which leads to the comprehension of ALL being ONE in energy aka the ONEness of ALL.
That would put me on pedestal; which would restrict my actions to those who put me there aka the cult of personality that worships me as their idol.
I rather stick to free will of choice for the sustenance of self.
What are the implications of addressing a perceived "bot"? How about you perceive what you read as a potential you lack to comprehend; while trying to adapt to any aspect of it that you comprehend?
Isn't there one line in there that you understand?
Answer for those your salad isn't percieved as 42. It is "whatever" :)
You write too much making yourself organic bullshit generator rather.
Why anybody would understand person who just uses not proper words, and uses really symbolism but in text not in symbol or graph (try dia). Not to mention those things you promote are shallow part of reality despite its worth - promoting individualism - really. Solipsism is probably wrong as there are too many independent and unwanted things so it is rather wrong to claim "all in one"/"all is one"...
Choice of want over need aka ignorance of need.
What if I write for the sustenance of self and not for others?
Show me where nature uses words to communicate to our perception? Why is it that other lifeforms can perceive; comprehend and act upon "grass" without anyone telling them that it's properly called "grass"?
How can I use symbol-ISM; while calling out all -isms as suggestions towards the ignorance of free will?
SYM'BOL, noun [Latin symbolum; Gr. with, and to throw; to compare.] Form is "with"in flow; flow "throws" form into its momentum; form "compares" itself to perceived inspiration by flow.
So you want pictures and less text? Are you a smartphone user?
DIA, - "Greek, a prefix, denotes through"...as form I already act "through" flow.
Look at my post count (0)...I don't offer; I adapt to inspiration for the sustenance of self.
ALL value is predefined within flow; while the ONEs within form hold the temporary free will of choice to evaluate it ALL.
Consenting to the suggested -ism; deceives the individual ONE to ignore free will of choice for the suggestion (-ism) made by the free will of another ONE.
Free will of choice does not equal individual-ISM; it represents the sole authority over ONEself (form) within ALL (flow), and consenting to any suggested -isms ignores that.
Yet another -ism you consented to; while propagating it to others (even when in doubt about it). Ask yourself this...does nature offer "wrong" information to our senses?
INDEPEND'ENT, adjective [in and dependent.] - "not dependent; not subject to control"...as life (form) are you not subjected to the movement from inception towards death (flow)?
Want represents the choice to ignore need (sustenance of life) for temptation luring towards death. Does it matter if life does "not want" death for death to reclaim life?
Correct; which is why I state to use implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false). When you say "wrong" you imply believing in "true"; which is why you judge what others write through the conflict of reason (true vs false).
Try implication and stay clear of reason and you will not find yourself in a conflict. So if "ALL is ONE in energy"; then everything moves...now adapt to what this inspires you to do and keep using implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
Learn that it cannot be blocked.