The old one was supposedly ended by the actual country of the united states, so they would have need for a new one to perpetuate their financial system.
So were our names (corporate identities) unclaimed for a while? Wouldn't that require destruction of the bonds on their side and the certificates on ours? Then again...laws of men equals organized crime anyway.
What's the difference between the old "in the name of" (corporate identity) and the new mark of approval? Just access to liberties?
The old one was supposedly ended by the actual country of the united states, so they would have need for a new one to perpetuate their financial system.
So were our names (corporate identities) unclaimed for a while? Wouldn't that require destruction of the bonds on their side and the certificates on ours? Then again...laws of men equals organized crime anyway.
It meant that we were free of the system, and no longer owned. Of course, they simply would ignore this, as their entire system is based on fraud.