Yes. But like the first system that tricked mothers into signing away their rights to their children, the vaccine passports are also based in deception and fraud.
So I ask, was consent actually provided then? Or was consent simply assumed through deception? Is there really any difference this time?
What's the difference between the old "in the name of" (corporate identity) and the new mark of approval? Just access to liberties?
Yes. But like the first system that tricked mothers into signing away their rights to their children, the vaccine passports are also based in deception and fraud.
So I ask, was consent actually provided then? Or was consent simply assumed through deception? Is there really any difference this time?