The infiltration represents the consent of the many by free will of choice to representative government. Representative for what? Free will of choice aka ones sole authority over self. What does the representative government use to rule those who consent to ignore their free will of choice? Their free will of choice.
"Maybe if we just vote for the right representative this time around...?"
Free will of choice cannot be given away; only ignored, and ignorance causes lack of comprehension; which is convenient for shirking responsibility over the consequences of ignorance.
I read it like this: "We can't say there are conspiracies, because that means we are crazy."
However, there are no coincidences, so when Seth Rich dies, and then his killers die 2 days later, that means -- there are conspiracies. His no coincidences line is a response and refutation of his no conspiracies line.
Thats true but what about stuff like 9/11? Clearly a conspiracy that was out in the open in the sense that it was in entertainment everywhere leading up to it but not in the sense that the true perpetrators got away (seemingly) and its still "publicly" unexposed.
Institute (to set) aka flow setting form (motion causing momentum)
Modus operandi (action) aka flow upon form and form within flow.
Government (govern/control and ment; from mens/mind) aka form suggesting other form to ignore flow for suggested form aka fiction over reality aka ignorance through suggestion aka mind control.
It's how the government operates.
Others suggest fiction; you consent to ignore reality for it aka government.
because they make the rules
For those who consent to ignore that flow defines the rules for form aka natural law. They suggest the laws of men aka the rules of the few to curtail the actions of the many; by deceiving them to submit free will of choice to their suggestions.
RULE, noun [Latin regula, from rego, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight.] What stretches life from inception towards death? What represents a straight movement from beginning towards end? Could it be flow?
There is no need for them to 'hide' or 'conspire'
Because nature (flow) does not withhold any thing from the form within; it offers everything tot hose who choose to adhere to it aka responding to it aka ONEs (form) responsibility over choice of action within ALL (flow).
A SE'CRET, adjective. [Latin secretus. This is given as the participle of secerno, but is radically a different word. The radical sense of seg is to separate, as in Latin seco, to cut off.] represents them using suggestions to cut the believers off from adaptation to perceived flow; needed to build comprehension within form.
It is flow the segregates form; and consent to suggestions (-isms) causes division (reason) aka further segregation instead of struggling towards unity to sustain form within flow.
our job is the Truth
Your responsibility is the balance between need and want; not winning the conflict between true and false. See, you "need" to struggle for balance to survive; you're tempted to "want" to win the conflict of reason. What you're reasoning about are the beliefs suggested to you by our parasitic few ankle biting drama queens.
Respond to flow; take responsibility over free will of choice by adaptation to flow; instead of submission to the suggestions of other form. Fuck them; tell em to shove a bagel where the sun doesn't shine and adhere to self sustenance. They're suggesting deadly temptations; you choose to fall for them. The ignorance of the many towards that is causing the existence of the few exploiting it.
The whole thing has been infiltrated because we put our guard down.
The infiltration represents the consent of the many by free will of choice to representative government. Representative for what? Free will of choice aka ones sole authority over self. What does the representative government use to rule those who consent to ignore their free will of choice? Their free will of choice.
Free will of choice cannot be given away; only ignored, and ignorance causes lack of comprehension; which is convenient for shirking responsibility over the consequences of ignorance.
I read it like this: "We can't say there are conspiracies, because that means we are crazy."
However, there are no coincidences, so when Seth Rich dies, and then his killers die 2 days later, that means -- there are conspiracies. His no coincidences line is a response and refutation of his no conspiracies line.
Thats true but what about stuff like 9/11? Clearly a conspiracy that was out in the open in the sense that it was in entertainment everywhere leading up to it but not in the sense that the true perpetrators got away (seemingly) and its still "publicly" unexposed.
Institute (to set) aka flow setting form (motion causing momentum)
Modus operandi (action) aka flow upon form and form within flow.
Government (govern/control and ment; from mens/mind) aka form suggesting other form to ignore flow for suggested form aka fiction over reality aka ignorance through suggestion aka mind control.
Others suggest fiction; you consent to ignore reality for it aka government.
For those who consent to ignore that flow defines the rules for form aka natural law. They suggest the laws of men aka the rules of the few to curtail the actions of the many; by deceiving them to submit free will of choice to their suggestions.
RULE, noun [Latin regula, from rego, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight.] What stretches life from inception towards death? What represents a straight movement from beginning towards end? Could it be flow?
Because nature (flow) does not withhold any thing from the form within; it offers everything tot hose who choose to adhere to it aka responding to it aka ONEs (form) responsibility over choice of action within ALL (flow).
A SE'CRET, adjective. [Latin secretus. This is given as the participle of secerno, but is radically a different word. The radical sense of seg is to separate, as in Latin seco, to cut off.] represents them using suggestions to cut the believers off from adaptation to perceived flow; needed to build comprehension within form.
It is flow the segregates form; and consent to suggestions (-isms) causes division (reason) aka further segregation instead of struggling towards unity to sustain form within flow.
Your responsibility is the balance between need and want; not winning the conflict between true and false. See, you "need" to struggle for balance to survive; you're tempted to "want" to win the conflict of reason. What you're reasoning about are the beliefs suggested to you by our parasitic few ankle biting drama queens.
Respond to flow; take responsibility over free will of choice by adaptation to flow; instead of submission to the suggestions of other form. Fuck them; tell em to shove a bagel where the sun doesn't shine and adhere to self sustenance. They're suggesting deadly temptations; you choose to fall for them. The ignorance of the many towards that is causing the existence of the few exploiting it.