to which they have since been demonstrated to have been wrong
Wanna show me another audit that said the first audit is wrong? Or is this the typical case where you just drop the “here’s the evidence” link and run.
That site legitimately considers a handwritten affidavit about being called a “Karen” while in line to vote as evidence of voter fraud, by the way.
The source your citing reported a year later, after an audit, that this wasn’t the result of voter fraud.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/09/state-audit-finds-questionable-votes-detroit/97696820/
I take your implication is that an audit is wrong if it doesn’t find voter fraud?
That’s not the point of an audit my guy.
I'm just glad to see your support for forensic audits, that will shed light on the election.
Wanna show me another audit that said the first audit is wrong? Or is this the typical case where you just drop the “here’s the evidence” link and run.
That site legitimately considers a handwritten affidavit about being called a “Karen” while in line to vote as evidence of voter fraud, by the way.