Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

15
Some anonymous insight into one journal's response to a new research paper on PCR false positives. "The claim that RT-qPCR tests can distinguish between the original virus & novel variants, even if they differ by only a single nucleotide change, is not evidence-based & beyond scientific realism." (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 5 years ago by clemaneuverers 5 years ago by clemaneuverers +15 / -0
4 comments download share
4 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (4)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– clemaneuverers [S] 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

They were too afraid to publish the paper, so the author subsequently had it published to an open source online journal, which is of course not prestigious and will be ignored by shillacademia, but still interesting to see and read:

https://researchinfotext.com/article-details/qPCR-is-not-PCR-Just-as-a-Straightjacket-is-not-a-Jacketthe-Truth-Revealed-by-SARS-CoV-2-False-Positive-Test-Results

The variants narrative & the lab leak narrative serve to prolong pandemic fear and the illusion that there is still or has ever been a novel virus that needs to be fought

...and perhaps are even intended to cover for an approaching flood of vaccine related illness and death after summer...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– clemaneuverers [S] 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

By the way if the language reads a little strange, looks like the response was machine translated from Japanese.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

realism

Reality and belief...believing represents a response to an offer, so is reality not real until someone within chooses to believe it is? If not...why would reality require belief from those within? If it doesn't...how ignorant can one be to consent to believe in realism?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– clemaneuverers [S] 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

The Bustin referred to is Prof Stephan Bustin, a well known pcr gatekeeper with massive conflicts of interest.

https://twitter.com/Bobby_Network/status/1405109333164187653

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - swdwj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy