You think that is an idle threat up there in the title? The elections are held on a state level. It is why the audits are going to have to happen on a state level.
Now do you need a link to that audit floor? Here it is. They have nine HD cameras streaming 24/7. Let us know what you see. I'm sure you are eager to find those cheaters.
In the early days of the audit I've seen threads with hundreds of replies created over the fact that someone scratched their butt over at patriots.win. I'm sure that you are just as eager to get to the truth as those over at patriots.win, who created those threads.
I’m sorry, but do you not know what the USC is? That’s the U.S. Code. I.e., the crime you just sent is a federal crime — y’know, something that gives Garland federal jurisdiction.
I already know what the truth is. I think the audits are clearly stupid, partisan smoke shows, but I have no issue with people doing them. To do so, however, you have to comply with federal law. If your audit breaks the statute that you just cited — again, which is what Garland is talking about — then I truly question how much of an “audit” it really is.
Yup, it also applies to those employed “by any State.” Hence, Garland has jurisdiction.
Wait, please don’t tell me you thought Arizona could use the U.S. Code against Garland, right? If so, you really need to retake high school civics my man.
News flash, federal elections are within federal jurisdiction.
You think that is an idle threat up there in the title? The elections are held on a state level. It is why the audits are going to have to happen on a state level.
18 USC 595
Now do you need a link to that audit floor? Here it is. They have nine HD cameras streaming 24/7. Let us know what you see. I'm sure you are eager to find those cheaters.
In the early days of the audit I've seen threads with hundreds of replies created over the fact that someone scratched their butt over at patriots.win. I'm sure that you are just as eager to get to the truth as those over at patriots.win, who created those threads.
I’m sorry, but do you not know what the USC is? That’s the U.S. Code. I.e., the crime you just sent is a federal crime — y’know, something that gives Garland federal jurisdiction.
I already know what the truth is. I think the audits are clearly stupid, partisan smoke shows, but I have no issue with people doing them. To do so, however, you have to comply with federal law. If your audit breaks the statute that you just cited — again, which is what Garland is talking about — then I truly question how much of an “audit” it really is.
The code details how that federal agents are explicitly excluded from interfering. Your comprehension skills are abysmal.
Why are you so incapable of learning?
Yup, it also applies to those employed “by any State.” Hence, Garland has jurisdiction.
Wait, please don’t tell me you thought Arizona could use the U.S. Code against Garland, right? If so, you really need to retake high school civics my man.
You are dumb, by the way. There is a reason why Trump had his hands tied on stopping the fraud.
The only reason the fed is worried about a state election audit, is because they're worried. Period.