There are other sources of radiation burns. A nuclear bomb is literally the absolutely least likely cause of radiation burn. Also, and more pertinently, how do we know they were radiation burns, and not chemical burns? See if you can tell me which is a radiation and which is chemical, by photos alone:
The old documentary footage of the testing, and of the aftermath in Japan, is not evidence of their existence. I think if they existed, they would have been used more than twice already. They were used just twice, days apart. And never again. And yet we are all supposed to live in fear of them. It's the most useful hoax of all time.
Are you 100% those were "radiation burns"?
Considering all the logistics taken in WW2, how hard is it to pull that one if (among many other reasons) they intended to fool Stalin into believing they had a secret god like weapon to keep him in check? (He later found out and faked his own "nuke" using the same method of the recent Beirut harbor "nuke".
If you see the footage of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with an open mind you could see there is a lot of merit that there was no nukes. The heat was so great from the fire bombings that there will be no shortage of fire burn pictures.
You know how people say its easier to actually go to the moon than to fake? That level of difficulty.
You have no evidence. Just "look at a picture". No, YOU look at it.
He later found out and faked his own "nuke" using the same method of the recent Beirut harbor "nuke".
Any evidence for this fucking garbage?
Because I say Stalin was REALLY the tooth fairy collecting Molars to build an indistructable castle made of teeth
"jUst lOoK aT pIctUrEs!!!!??????!!!!!!!!!!"
No
If you see the footage of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
If you're parents are related, you think nukes are "fAkE nEwS!"
there is a lot of merit th
Name ANYTHING besides saying "look at a picture". What evidence? None.
The heat was so great from the fire bombings that there will be no shortage of fire burn pictures.
Ohhhhhhhhhh. You think there's any such thing as "fIrE"? What a pleb your momma raised.
See, "fire" is actually radiation from the sun bouncing off of your mommas big fat ass. Just look at any pictures of your mommas ass. It's the goy trick to keep the jews from molesting all of their children, but we won't fall for it.
So, what's up with any evidence that Japan wasn't nuked? How would you explain the radiation burns on people?
Is a radiation burn evidence of a nuclear bomb?
It's evidence of high levels of radiation, which a bomb would do. Yes.
There are other sources of radiation burns. A nuclear bomb is literally the absolutely least likely cause of radiation burn. Also, and more pertinently, how do we know they were radiation burns, and not chemical burns? See if you can tell me which is a radiation and which is chemical, by photos alone:
1
2
No cheating and looking at the address bar....
For entire cities? What about the complete decimation of any buildings? What about people being reduced to piles of smoldering carbon?
Why do you lack any sort of skepticism when some smooth brain says "viruses are dead cells and soap bubbles"? Hypocrite much?
Why would a chemical burn look different? I'm not a doctor and you most certainly aren't.
Out of curiosity, what would you consider evidence?
The old documentary footage of the testing, and of the aftermath in Japan, is not evidence of their existence. I think if they existed, they would have been used more than twice already. They were used just twice, days apart. And never again. And yet we are all supposed to live in fear of them. It's the most useful hoax of all time.
And my question is still the same : what would you consider evidence?
On what occasion for example?
Are you 100% those were "radiation burns"? Considering all the logistics taken in WW2, how hard is it to pull that one if (among many other reasons) they intended to fool Stalin into believing they had a secret god like weapon to keep him in check? (He later found out and faked his own "nuke" using the same method of the recent Beirut harbor "nuke".
If you see the footage of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with an open mind you could see there is a lot of merit that there was no nukes. The heat was so great from the fire bombings that there will be no shortage of fire burn pictures.
You know how people say its easier to actually go to the moon than to fake? That level of difficulty.
You have no evidence. Just "look at a picture". No, YOU look at it.
Any evidence for this fucking garbage?
Because I say Stalin was REALLY the tooth fairy collecting Molars to build an indistructable castle made of teeth
"jUst lOoK aT pIctUrEs!!!!??????!!!!!!!!!!"
No
If you're parents are related, you think nukes are "fAkE nEwS!"
Name ANYTHING besides saying "look at a picture". What evidence? None.
Ohhhhhhhhhh. You think there's any such thing as "fIrE"? What a pleb your momma raised.
See, "fire" is actually radiation from the sun bouncing off of your mommas big fat ass. Just look at any pictures of your mommas ass. It's the goy trick to keep the jews from molesting all of their children, but we won't fall for it.
"Wake up sheeple!"
Having a bad day?
Nope. You're wrong and you should feel wrong