There are other sources of radiation burns. A nuclear bomb is literally the absolutely least likely cause of radiation burn. Also, and more pertinently, how do we know they were radiation burns, and not chemical burns? See if you can tell me which is a radiation and which is chemical, by photos alone:
It's evidence of high levels of radiation, which a bomb would do. Yes.
There are other sources of radiation burns. A nuclear bomb is literally the absolutely least likely cause of radiation burn. Also, and more pertinently, how do we know they were radiation burns, and not chemical burns? See if you can tell me which is a radiation and which is chemical, by photos alone:
1
2
No cheating and looking at the address bar....
For entire cities? What about the complete decimation of any buildings? What about people being reduced to piles of smoldering carbon?
Why do you lack any sort of skepticism when some smooth brain says "viruses are dead cells and soap bubbles"? Hypocrite much?
Why would a chemical burn look different? I'm not a doctor and you most certainly aren't.