Yes, you are taking a farcical position. That of flatly believing in something you've clearly never looked into with an open mind. And that of believing Israel's keeping other nations "in check" is a positive thing.
Are you 100% those were "radiation burns"?
Considering all the logistics taken in WW2, how hard is it to pull that one if (among many other reasons) they intended to fool Stalin into believing they had a secret god like weapon to keep him in check? (He later found out and faked his own "nuke" using the same method of the recent Beirut harbor "nuke".
If you see the footage of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with an open mind you could see there is a lot of merit that there was no nukes. The heat was so great from the fire bombings that there will be no shortage of fire burn pictures.
You know how people say its easier to actually go to the moon than to fake? That level of difficulty.
You have no evidence. Just "look at a picture". No, YOU look at it.
He later found out and faked his own "nuke" using the same method of the recent Beirut harbor "nuke".
Any evidence for this fucking garbage?
Because I say Stalin was REALLY the tooth fairy collecting Molars to build an indistructable castle made of teeth
"jUst lOoK aT pIctUrEs!!!!??????!!!!!!!!!!"
No
If you see the footage of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
If you're parents are related, you think nukes are "fAkE nEwS!"
there is a lot of merit th
Name ANYTHING besides saying "look at a picture". What evidence? None.
The heat was so great from the fire bombings that there will be no shortage of fire burn pictures.
Ohhhhhhhhhh. You think there's any such thing as "fIrE"? What a pleb your momma raised.
See, "fire" is actually radiation from the sun bouncing off of your mommas big fat ass. Just look at any pictures of your mommas ass. It's the goy trick to keep the jews from molesting all of their children, but we won't fall for it.
Yes, you are taking a farcical position. That of flatly believing in something you've clearly never looked into with an open mind. And that of believing Israel's keeping other nations "in check" is a positive thing.
So, what's up with any evidence that Japan wasn't nuked? How would you explain the radiation burns on people?
Is a radiation burn evidence of a nuclear bomb?
It's evidence of high levels of radiation, which a bomb would do. Yes.
Out of curiosity, what would you consider evidence?
Are you 100% those were "radiation burns"? Considering all the logistics taken in WW2, how hard is it to pull that one if (among many other reasons) they intended to fool Stalin into believing they had a secret god like weapon to keep him in check? (He later found out and faked his own "nuke" using the same method of the recent Beirut harbor "nuke".
If you see the footage of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with an open mind you could see there is a lot of merit that there was no nukes. The heat was so great from the fire bombings that there will be no shortage of fire burn pictures.
You know how people say its easier to actually go to the moon than to fake? That level of difficulty.
You have no evidence. Just "look at a picture". No, YOU look at it.
Any evidence for this fucking garbage?
Because I say Stalin was REALLY the tooth fairy collecting Molars to build an indistructable castle made of teeth
"jUst lOoK aT pIctUrEs!!!!??????!!!!!!!!!!"
No
If you're parents are related, you think nukes are "fAkE nEwS!"
Name ANYTHING besides saying "look at a picture". What evidence? None.
Ohhhhhhhhhh. You think there's any such thing as "fIrE"? What a pleb your momma raised.
See, "fire" is actually radiation from the sun bouncing off of your mommas big fat ass. Just look at any pictures of your mommas ass. It's the goy trick to keep the jews from molesting all of their children, but we won't fall for it.
"Wake up sheeple!"
How do you know they were increased due to nuclear testing? How do you know they were increased?
Nuclear bombs have allegedly been used just twice, long before you were born (I'm presuming).
Fuck dude, how do you not know about the original test in New Mexico for starters, did you think the first use on Hiroshima was untested?
"There have been 2,121 tests done since the first in July 1945, involving 2,476 nuclear devices."
So wrong by three orders of magnitude, you should stop presuming.