I mean that's to find out and investigate yourself if that interests you, bro... Why hide it? Any answer I give would only be a speculation. Look at imperial evidence of what is presented by these people, it's a bunch of bullshit. That's like asking why does CNN spout propaganda all day everyday. It's the same crowd of people orchestrating the orchestrators to orchestrate. They create the fantastic theorems and pay genius subservient mathematicians to conceptualize and try to explain physics of the universe assuming the fairy tale is true even though it contradicts actual physics, then they award these math theorists Nobel Peace prizes. So easy to fool people who have no idea what they're looking at. Black holes and the big bang hahaha. "A black hole has an infinite density; since its volume is zero, it is compressed to the very limit."OK. What a crock of shit with no proof. Just like the big bang "Big Bang postulates that, 13.7 billion years ago, our universe emerged from a singularity — a point of infinite density and gravity". Ah so these two exists simultaneously? WHERE'S THE FUCKING PROOF? Ha ha ha. Space time "In physics, spacetime is any mathematical model which fuses the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time into a single four-dimensional manifold." Fucking imperical proof yeah, no? No. OK! HOW ABOUT A REAL PICTURE OF EARTH NO? NOPE! HAHAHA
What's your thoughts/ theory of what's beyond what we physically know according to your flat earth idea's.. think we have quite a bit of land beyond what we physically know?
Can one just jump off the edge?.. or will you go splat once you hit this so called "firmament"?
Outer edge not confirmed. Strong evidence you can not go up but so high. Van Allen Belts, Go Fast Rocket (although the go fast rocket hitting the Firmament supposedly had a mechanism like a spring loaded yo-yo to stop the spin, although it did appear to almost instantly stop it's upward ascent which looked unnatural in my opinion, plausibly hit something), videos of Sprites and Elves taken at high altitude in slow motion looks like something above them that looks like a water wave. The outer perimeter there is nothing definitive.. You're not allowed to go there (obviously Antarctica Treaty), and citizen Youtubers and modern day explorers would surely go there anyways disregarding TPTB, however have seen nothing of any people actually journeying and documenting everything which they surely would do. Antarctica (allegedly) has the highest altitude of any continent, which makes it a good container for the oceans. Ewar had an interesting take on his last video LINK HERE that every 2160 years that we transition into a new, we are entering the age of Pisces, each time we enter a new age the entire realm shifts, places that are land now will become ice and new land will be revealed. As you may or may not be aware, the north pole is moving, which makes sense on this type of model. Is it confirmed, no. It certainly could be a possibility, would recommend watching the episode.
K. But as far as I can tell, spinning stars can only happen near the poles of a globe, or other elaborate earth models. Where these photos are claimed to have been taken near the equator.
You would have to be near the equator for this kind of shot. Taken at Fort Jefferson 70 miles off the coast of key west. Key west is at the end of the line the furthest south west of Florida you can get (near Cuba). The mentioned frames of opposite star rotations would be Pointed towards the equator.. Spinning stars are visible anywhere above or below the equitorial line, and they spin in opposite directions north/south from the Equator. This would seem plausible on a globe earth, except for the fact you can capture rotations of both directions in a single frame. This would only be possible if the stars were actually moving and not the earth.
Try it yourself - even though we all know you won't.
Take your camera outside on a tripod, point it anywhere at the sky and expose for a few minutes. Then, polar align ( figure it out ) your camera and take another exposure the same length, tell me what you get.
You certainly don't need to be a "pro" or even have a "pro" camera, just one that lets you do long exposures.
And your link to the "pro" photographer is just a link to CanonUSA twitter.
Also why are you giving photography instructions? Undoubtedly you'd be non polar aligned. I didn't state anything contrary to this, not sure why you want to give a photography 101 spill. If your camera is viewing south of where Orions belt would align you'll get the opposite rotation. Easier to get both rotations in frame closer to the equator.
A product of the old world before a reset event?
Indeed, either that or this is all a helluva coincidence. This is what many mudflooders would call a star fort.
"not possible on a Globe earth" lmao we got Bob the builder here folks.
If flat earth is true. Why hide it?
How about we focus on that to give better understanding to this stupid theory
Shed some light bruh!
I mean that's to find out and investigate yourself if that interests you, bro... Why hide it? Any answer I give would only be a speculation. Look at imperial evidence of what is presented by these people, it's a bunch of bullshit. That's like asking why does CNN spout propaganda all day everyday. It's the same crowd of people orchestrating the orchestrators to orchestrate. They create the fantastic theorems and pay genius subservient mathematicians to conceptualize and try to explain physics of the universe assuming the fairy tale is true even though it contradicts actual physics, then they award these math theorists Nobel Peace prizes. So easy to fool people who have no idea what they're looking at. Black holes and the big bang hahaha. "A black hole has an infinite density; since its volume is zero, it is compressed to the very limit."OK. What a crock of shit with no proof. Just like the big bang "Big Bang postulates that, 13.7 billion years ago, our universe emerged from a singularity — a point of infinite density and gravity". Ah so these two exists simultaneously? WHERE'S THE FUCKING PROOF? Ha ha ha. Space time "In physics, spacetime is any mathematical model which fuses the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time into a single four-dimensional manifold." Fucking imperical proof yeah, no? No. OK! HOW ABOUT A REAL PICTURE OF EARTH NO? NOPE! HAHAHA
What's your thoughts/ theory of what's beyond what we physically know according to your flat earth idea's.. think we have quite a bit of land beyond what we physically know?
Can one just jump off the edge?.. or will you go splat once you hit this so called "firmament"?
Outer edge not confirmed. Strong evidence you can not go up but so high. Van Allen Belts, Go Fast Rocket (although the go fast rocket hitting the Firmament supposedly had a mechanism like a spring loaded yo-yo to stop the spin, although it did appear to almost instantly stop it's upward ascent which looked unnatural in my opinion, plausibly hit something), videos of Sprites and Elves taken at high altitude in slow motion looks like something above them that looks like a water wave. The outer perimeter there is nothing definitive.. You're not allowed to go there (obviously Antarctica Treaty), and citizen Youtubers and modern day explorers would surely go there anyways disregarding TPTB, however have seen nothing of any people actually journeying and documenting everything which they surely would do. Antarctica (allegedly) has the highest altitude of any continent, which makes it a good container for the oceans. Ewar had an interesting take on his last video LINK HERE that every 2160 years that we transition into a new, we are entering the age of Pisces, each time we enter a new age the entire realm shifts, places that are land now will become ice and new land will be revealed. As you may or may not be aware, the north pole is moving, which makes sense on this type of model. Is it confirmed, no. It certainly could be a possibility, would recommend watching the episode.
That's just photoshop from a lazy youtuber that doesn't own a time lapse camera, the skills to use it, or the time an authority for those shots.
This is a Canon sponsored professional photographer https://mobile.twitter.com/CanonUSApro/status/1175160236929441796
K. But as far as I can tell, spinning stars can only happen near the poles of a globe, or other elaborate earth models. Where these photos are claimed to have been taken near the equator.
You're theory is?
You would have to be near the equator for this kind of shot. Taken at Fort Jefferson 70 miles off the coast of key west. Key west is at the end of the line the furthest south west of Florida you can get (near Cuba). The mentioned frames of opposite star rotations would be Pointed towards the equator.. Spinning stars are visible anywhere above or below the equitorial line, and they spin in opposite directions north/south from the Equator. This would seem plausible on a globe earth, except for the fact you can capture rotations of both directions in a single frame. This would only be possible if the stars were actually moving and not the earth.
wrong, as usual.
He just didn't polar align his camera.
Try it yourself - even though we all know you won't.
Take your camera outside on a tripod, point it anywhere at the sky and expose for a few minutes. Then, polar align ( figure it out ) your camera and take another exposure the same length, tell me what you get.
You certainly don't need to be a "pro" or even have a "pro" camera, just one that lets you do long exposures.
And your link to the "pro" photographer is just a link to CanonUSA twitter.
Also why are you giving photography instructions? Undoubtedly you'd be non polar aligned. I didn't state anything contrary to this, not sure why you want to give a photography 101 spill. If your camera is viewing south of where Orions belt would align you'll get the opposite rotation. Easier to get both rotations in frame closer to the equator.
Wrong, the link is to a post from CanonUSA mentioning Skyglow Project.
The night sky is fake just like your reason for being here.
Your boyfriend is going to catch you flirting on here again. Also, where the hell is your helmet?