Tophets, the places where child sacrifice was done in Jerusalem and elsewhere, were linked to the Phoenicians and Carthaginians as well. I certainly think it plausible that the Aztecs were influenced by them, and that even places like Bohemian Grove were Phoenician originally.
So the stone markers at tophets sometimes had the word MLK meaning sacrifice on them, sometimes with other words denoting type of sacrifice.
My random thought was that MLK was virtually the same as Moloch, and indeed there is some speculation that Moloch was actually sacrifice or a type of sacrifice, not a god. The owl at Bohemian Grove always seemed to be more likely about Minerva or Lilith than Moloch.
'Course the Podesta emails have the actual Moloch reference, so I'm inclined to think that they believe it's real. They're all bootlickers though, so they'll worship anything at the drop of a hat to gain any advantage.
Even on a personal level it's for exactly the same reason. Just swap "to bless my crops and give us a good harvest" with "more freedom and financial independence to do what I want."
In some ways, the modern reason is actually more evil.
The Catholics were in South America long before Columbus. They introduced child sacrifice to the Americas. They spread the "earth is flat" rumors so they could rob as much gold as possible from these civilizations while destroying them from within. Actual Christians would have fucked up their plans.
I'm sure you heard it's just a coincidence the Egyptians and Mesomericans had pyramids. You might also have heard that there is evidence Nordic people traded with Americans long before Columbus "discovered" America. The Goths who sacked Rome and established Catholicism were Nordic.
Interesting parallel.
Tophets, the places where child sacrifice was done in Jerusalem and elsewhere, were linked to the Phoenicians and Carthaginians as well. I certainly think it plausible that the Aztecs were influenced by them, and that even places like Bohemian Grove were Phoenician originally.
So the stone markers at tophets sometimes had the word MLK meaning sacrifice on them, sometimes with other words denoting type of sacrifice.
My random thought was that MLK was virtually the same as Moloch, and indeed there is some speculation that Moloch was actually sacrifice or a type of sacrifice, not a god. The owl at Bohemian Grove always seemed to be more likely about Minerva or Lilith than Moloch.
'Course the Podesta emails have the actual Moloch reference, so I'm inclined to think that they believe it's real. They're all bootlickers though, so they'll worship anything at the drop of a hat to gain any advantage.
Even on a personal level it's for exactly the same reason. Just swap "to bless my crops and give us a good harvest" with "more freedom and financial independence to do what I want."
In some ways, the modern reason is actually more evil.
It's like that one yearbook meme of the dude saying, "It's not enough that I should succeed-others should fail."
It's rather funny because of the truth of it.
The Catholics were in South America long before Columbus. They introduced child sacrifice to the Americas. They spread the "earth is flat" rumors so they could rob as much gold as possible from these civilizations while destroying them from within. Actual Christians would have fucked up their plans.
I'm sure you heard it's just a coincidence the Egyptians and Mesomericans had pyramids. You might also have heard that there is evidence Nordic people traded with Americans long before Columbus "discovered" America. The Goths who sacked Rome and established Catholicism were Nordic.
Yes, another "coincidence". It's funny how any other time when historians see coincidences like this they would conclude there were interactions.