Quite a mind blowing video. Gödel proved that any and all worthwhile systems of logic are incomplete. That is, there are true statements which exist within any given system which the system itself is incapable of proving.
If you’ve studied ancient conceptions of religion, you may be familiar with the term “ein sof”,”pleroma”, or “Godhead”, and if you’re familiar with military interventionism and history you may have heard the idiom “known unknowns and unknown unknowns”. Could the ancients have instinctively understood the limits of logic, without having formally proved such things?
I just think that this video could produce so many interesting discussions I want to try not to limit them too much here, so please post anything this video evokes in you and let’s discuss
"I just think that this video could produce so many interesting discussions I want to try not to limit them too much here, so please post anything this video evokes in you and let’s discuss"
You said that last time. Shortly there after you resorted to name calling.
Subsequentially, your video links now evoke a sense of distrust in me.
Part 2:
Quite a mind blowing video. Gödel proved that any and all worthwhile systems of logic are incomplete. That is, there are true statements which exist within any given system which the system itself is incapable of proving.
If you’ve studied ancient conceptions of religion, you may be familiar with the term “ein sof”,”pleroma”, or “Godhead”, and if you’re familiar with military interventionism and history you may have heard the idiom “known unknowns and unknown unknowns”. Could the ancients have instinctively understood the limits of logic, without having formally proved such things?
I just think that this video could produce so many interesting discussions I want to try not to limit them too much here, so please post anything this video evokes in you and let’s discuss
-1=1 false?
-1^2=1^2 True?
Seems like you either skipped or missed the point of the video. The symbols you’re using are fundamentally flawed representations of reality.
You said that last time. Shortly there after you resorted to name calling.
Subsequentially, your video links now evoke a sense of distrust in me.
A week later and you still have nothing to contribute. This inspires a sense of suspicious intent as well.
Here. I have created this for you.
Let me know when you would like to be named Guild Master.
Is that like theoretical physics?