Graham Hancock has sent me on this rabbit hole. In addition to Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock, I’ve read Plato’s Timaeus and Critias as well as Atlantis: The Antediluvian World. Please share Any other resources or authors you have found worthwhile. Thanks.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
Issac Newton was an antediluvian. If you can find his beliefs and his pyramid equation and code. He suggested every stone on the great pyramid precisely aligned into the planet's geometry, circumference. What access did these people have we don't have today. They obviously were taught differently using other books and research. His actual manuscripts are hard to find because of gravity. They question his knighted status when they conflict with the royal dinosaur society's witchcraft. But like Plato he believed there was advanced civilization prior to the flood. The flood was a fact then, unlike it is today. Although it has finally been proved with the younger dryas impact. But it will take years for the textbooks to change from their modern Oxford apelike bullshit. Lucy ain't even the oldest hominini. Lucy doesn't exist outside of CGI unlike the footprints on Crete. But they will simply push the dates back if indeed they can prove any age beyond the current dating, because of evolution needing some other creation for inserting our invasive species. Although we are at crossroads today. The Greenland crater. Gobleki Tepi, and many other new archealogical finds challenging the accepted narrative. It means the current paradigm will have to adapt or it fails. Civilization is older.
There was also a huge argument which raged for decades after Napoleon's exhibition and presumably the Dendera Zodiac's age, you will have to research the antideluvian historian suggesting it, but it aligns past 5000 years. The constellation in its creation would have been much older than it has been suggested. Seen then in the universe at what date. Proving like the damage on the Sphinx, Egypt is much older. But because of Catholic recording any argument failed, despite science today possibly proving the constellation on its creation aligned to an older age then Egyptology has assumed, but Catholicism won and it meant it cannot be older then potentially the bible's dating. The argument also fails because the disc could have been recreated later.
The gatekeepers of history have constantly inserted superstition and theory, because nobody has been able to disprove them telling us we are monkeys. History has therefore been rewritten to insert nonsense, suggesting that before the common era there was virtually no other advancement, they went from cavemen to master pyramids builders, because Christ has forgiven them. Meanwhile the bible is of course a bunch of fiction which has been rewritten and relayed on top of other history. The paradigm constructed has meant anything that doesn't fit into its superstitious dating of apelike logic is removed without debate, and any argument suggesting advance civilization prior to the ape crafting the pyramids is absolutely forbidden and censored by education.
This is the good shit. I knew Sir Isaac Newton was into the occult, but hadn't heard about his antediluvian research.
You should check out the video series called Atlantis Rising by Spacebusters.
I think there’s a part 1, 2, 3, 4a, and 4b
It’s sounds outlandish, but then again, most things happening today sound just as crazy
Will do, thanks.
Here’s the first parts in one video
And here’s the finale
https://odysee.com/@GLOBEBUSTERS:c/atlantis-rising-finale-part-5:1
Michael cremo has an interesting take on things
Robert Sepehr makes great summary/research videos
Mauro biglino is good, but all his stuff is in Italian (most with subtitles though)
Big fan of Robert Sephr. And the ukulele covers. Will check out the others.