Something I never questioned until this idiot told me not to
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
wrong.
Artificial light can NOT work in a vacuum. Take a clear tube, a flashlight and a vacuum cleaner. Real simple. Artificial light reacts with oxygen. No oxygen in space. You can even go to NASA's website and read, for yourself, the ENTIRE equipment lists for the Moon landings - no artificial lights.
The VA Radiation belts aren't clouds. Do know what radiation is? It's a form of light, doesn't have a physical property you can touch.
Take a container. Fill half with fuel, half with oxygen. Place an igniter inside. Place entire container in a vacuum. Ignite, and open a vent for exhaust ( or all you have is a bomb ). The nanosecond the vent opens, the vacuum rushes in and separates all atoms. Process fails.
Combustion of any kind can not work in a vacuum.
I think you better check who the 'fuckin retarded' one is. Artificial light, as in a flashlight, studio lights, CERTAINLY will not work in a vacuum. Go back to school "fucking retard".
And yet we illuminate inside vacuum chambers.
By your logic, vacuum sealed beam headlights, standardized in 1940, wouldn't work because the light would never leave the vacuum sealed unit. But they do work, because regardless of source, light can travel through a vacuum.
Show me these in space, working please
It’s astonishing how confident you are while being so obviously wrong.
Guess you missed my post on the Dunning Kruger effect.
Wow