You dismissed the part where they claim the footage exists and shows the impact and that is why they want it back, as reported by CNN. You simply say you don't believe it as if that settles it. Clue: it doesn't settle anything.
It would be easier to believe you if I knew your business had security cameras 24/7 and was just up the block from a confirmed bigfoot sighting of which we already have abundant evidence. You are making strawmen to knock down and false equivalencies to back up your fallacies. You are dumber than anyone I have ever had the misfortune to be in a comment thread with. You are, however, very persistent so I expect at least one more insult from you so you have the last word. But I am done here. Thread readers will judge with their downvotes as they already have begun to do.
"i want my camera footage back"
doesn't mean "there is evidence on that camera footage"
again... a keypad security gate still camera doesn't prove that the hotel down the block had a camera pointed at the sky.
...just stop.
You dismissed the part where they claim the footage exists and shows the impact and that is why they want it back, as reported by CNN. You simply say you don't believe it as if that settles it. Clue: it doesn't settle anything.
i report to have footage of bigfoot on a camera that some cops took from me in 2001
therefore bigfoot is real and the government is hiding the truth
It would be easier to believe you if I knew your business had security cameras 24/7 and was just up the block from a confirmed bigfoot sighting of which we already have abundant evidence. You are making strawmen to knock down and false equivalencies to back up your fallacies. You are dumber than anyone I have ever had the misfortune to be in a comment thread with. You are, however, very persistent so I expect at least one more insult from you so you have the last word. But I am done here. Thread readers will judge with their downvotes as they already have begun to do.