Looking at it myself, I can say it looks like it's a self-devaluing mechanism that gives the people who have had the time and resources to buy most of it (China and globalists) rewards for having large portions of them. Others would need to prop up the prices for them. If people move onto a new one that doesn't do this, then they will be buying into one that is easily controlled by the same people because it requires even less resources to acquire.
Shit article.
Looking at it myself, I can say it looks like it's a self-devaluing mechanism that gives the people who have had the time and resources to buy most of it (China and globalists) rewards for having large portions of them. Others would need to prop up the prices for them. If people move onto a new one that doesn't do this, then they will be buying into one that is easily controlled by the same people because it requires even less resources to acquire.
I do not like proof of stake. You earn by already having. Or more accurately, profit, as nobody is truly earning anything under proof of stake.