No I’m quite familiar with the blockchain. The article just seems to me to state the obvious, something that Bitcoin was never purported to solve, and then say that makes it useless.
“Uh” (seriously, what kid of douche types this?), you said it was meaningless, friend. It was far from meaningless. I guess it’s my fault for taking you literally in a technical conversation, right?
I was asking what you thought was meaningful about the article because I already understand the blockchain and didn’t see anything interesting in it.
You don’t really seem to want to talk about that though. That’s fair, but makes it a lot less interesting to me. Calling me a douche is even more boring. Take care.
No I’m quite familiar with the blockchain. The article just seems to me to state the obvious, something that Bitcoin was never purported to solve, and then say that makes it useless.
Cool. You could have just said that in the first place, Mr. Programmer.
Uh, I did. That's why I was asking what you got from it.
“Uh” (seriously, what kid of douche types this?), you said it was meaningless, friend. It was far from meaningless. I guess it’s my fault for taking you literally in a technical conversation, right?
I was asking what you thought was meaningful about the article because I already understand the blockchain and didn’t see anything interesting in it.
You don’t really seem to want to talk about that though. That’s fair, but makes it a lot less interesting to me. Calling me a douche is even more boring. Take care.