I met Richard Feynman. The nuclear bomb was real but a lot of other stuff he knew was not allowed and they even mocked him to discredit him. He said they nearly blew themselves up. They basically invented nukes by trial and error.
Once again your pee brain assumes a conspiracy when the truth is more plausible.
The camera's video format was incompatible with existing NTSC, PAL, and SECAM broadcast television standards. It needed to be converted before it could be shown on broadcast television networks. This live conversion was crude, essentially using a video camera pointing at a high-quality 10-inch TV monitor.
Isn't it convenient that it wasn't possible to show the direct footage, allegedly obtained from the moon's surface and in orbit around it? And wasn't it compoundingly* convenient that the telemetry tapes, which few seem to realize actually contained ALL the data obtained from space during the Apollo missions, including the filmed footage (which was displayed on monitors, in turn filmed by TV cameras for broadcast, as you said); isn't it convenient that those telemetry tapes disappered completely, never to be found again, and all we are left with is the second hand documentation?
IMO one might start to entirely question the actual, original existence of those telemetry tapes... they could have been ordinary film footage... and as such faked.
Isn’t it convenient you tin foilers can’t understand a joker spread a hoax 40 years ago that the moon landing was faked and you still think it’s true. The shill is you for continuing to support a hoax. Only moron faced with a massive mountain of evidence continue to deny its existence.
Lol, continue to to hide behind that "mountain", but that same mountain largely disproves the Apollo Moon Landings veracity, when analyzed with an open mind.
Also, what I have stated above does not imply no one has ever been to the moon. It only indicates (as do many other evidences aside from it) is that the documentaion of the Apollo Moon Landings specifically, was entirely faked. Beyond that, who knows what has really gone on...
I think that might be very possible. Also for example Mohenjo Daro radiation and its "debunking". Something happened...
By the way:
"Then the LORD rained down sulfur and fire on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the LORD out of the heavens. 25Thus He destroyed these cities and the entire plain, including all the inhabitants of the cities and everything that grew on the ground"
That HP/Mars commercial was awesome nice post. Also I didn't know about that white phosporous weapon how awful. I'm not a lefty but I agree with adding those to the treaty!
Agreed this isn't a flat earth post not sure how that got read into it. This is a 'we didn't have the tech to send a man to the moon and still probably don't' post. Though how it ties to nuclear explosion footage I don't quite grasp.
Footage of nuclear exclusions are always low quality, very similar to moon mission video.. they had the camera tech back then, the public should not be seeing grainy video of a video as we're shown.
I met Richard Feynman. The nuclear bomb was real but a lot of other stuff he knew was not allowed and they even mocked him to discredit him. He said they nearly blew themselves up. They basically invented nukes by trial and error.
Once again your pee brain assumes a conspiracy when the truth is more plausible.
The camera's video format was incompatible with existing NTSC, PAL, and SECAM broadcast television standards. It needed to be converted before it could be shown on broadcast television networks. This live conversion was crude, essentially using a video camera pointing at a high-quality 10-inch TV monitor.
This is not a defense of a flat earth hypothesis
Isn't it convenient that it wasn't possible to show the direct footage, allegedly obtained from the moon's surface and in orbit around it? And wasn't it compoundingly* convenient that the telemetry tapes, which few seem to realize actually contained ALL the data obtained from space during the Apollo missions, including the filmed footage (which was displayed on monitors, in turn filmed by TV cameras for broadcast, as you said); isn't it convenient that those telemetry tapes disappered completely, never to be found again, and all we are left with is the second hand documentation?
IMO one might start to entirely question the actual, original existence of those telemetry tapes... they could have been ordinary film footage... and as such faked.
Isn’t it convenient you tin foilers can’t understand a joker spread a hoax 40 years ago that the moon landing was faked and you still think it’s true. The shill is you for continuing to support a hoax. Only moron faced with a massive mountain of evidence continue to deny its existence.
Lol, continue to to hide behind that "mountain", but that same mountain largely disproves the Apollo Moon Landings veracity, when analyzed with an open mind.
Also, what I have stated above does not imply no one has ever been to the moon. It only indicates (as do many other evidences aside from it) is that the documentaion of the Apollo Moon Landings specifically, was entirely faked. Beyond that, who knows what has really gone on...
That's an interesting way to phrase it. Another way would be 'a whistleblower came forward 40 years ago...'
Yeah they lost the originals and actually can't even go back to do it again they lost the technology. Cool story bro.
Because those moon video WAS fake.But it not means earth is flat you moron,it means they hide video from the moon.And some photos too.
Whatever you call those creatures: aliens/demons/angels - they met them on the moon.
Van Allen Belts
Ok,but I wouldn't repeat the story with walking on fire where you simply argue "earth is flat" and nothing more...
This isn't a flat earth post though.
ok,but it is your bias so I mentioned it pre-emptively.
The fact is you are COMPLETELY RIGHT about those video and photos from the moon being fake or changed. - just keep this FACT away from anything else.
By the way "stupid old commercial" about Mars: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFAbTLWiK20 - predictive programming or other truth in plain sight ?
Because: https://www.tsijournals.com/articles/evidence-of-massive-thermonuclear-explosions-on-mars-in-the-past-the-cydonian-hypothesis-and-fermis-paradox-new-data.pdf
I think that might be very possible. Also for example Mohenjo Daro radiation and its "debunking". Something happened...
By the way:
"Then the LORD rained down sulfur and fire on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the LORD out of the heavens. 25Thus He destroyed these cities and the entire plain, including all the inhabitants of the cities and everything that grew on the ground"
How to achieve similar effect ? For example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90DmiMX9Lvg , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gHUhqK_MJE
Periscopes don't work on a globe by the way
That HP/Mars commercial was awesome nice post. Also I didn't know about that white phosporous weapon how awful. I'm not a lefty but I agree with adding those to the treaty!
Agreed this isn't a flat earth post not sure how that got read into it. This is a 'we didn't have the tech to send a man to the moon and still probably don't' post. Though how it ties to nuclear explosion footage I don't quite grasp.
Footage of nuclear exclusions are always low quality, very similar to moon mission video.. they had the camera tech back then, the public should not be seeing grainy video of a video as we're shown.
..... so.. you're admitting to the fact the VA belts are real?
Of course the VA belts are real - Electric Universe Theory is pretty strong on the presence and form of radiation belts/magnetism/birkland currents.
Just repeating the excuse NASA gives regarding space exploration. There is no outer space.
There is,and there is more than we are not allowed to know about that than you can imagine.
Fluff bullshit.