What were "all" the provable mistakes? The one about the journal? Was there anything else?
Because otherwise, everyone here knows the EUA is a sham. That's not "drinking Kool-Aid", that's common sense.
See, we know that experimental gene therapy isn't the answer to something that isn't really an issue...or shouldn't be. For like 99.999% of the population.
"provable mistakes besides the journal" - as though that didn't matter. It was #1. #2 - the chloroquine study was statistically insignificant. An animal study on a small number of animals in 2005.No human study. A dead end. Of no relevance in light of the subsequent studies involving millions of humans in the 2020s. #3 The assumption that one coronavirus is exactly the same as another. "One coronavirus infects a few thousand, kills a few hundred. That's exactly the same as another one that infects hundreds of millions and kills millions." Out of hundreds of coronaviruses.
I repeat: I'm not talking to you. I'm talking to anyone who thinks you're making the least bit of sense.
"common sense" - that's the thing that tells you the Earth is flat and the Sun and Moon go around it. You only have to look up in the sky to see it. No need for Science. Congratulations! Anyone with a brain can see you're right there with the Flat Earthers.
"99.999% of the population" - A number out of someone's asshole. If 100 people get virus 2 of them will die. If you're young and healthy it won't be you, it'll be your Grandma or your cousin with the kidney transplant.
What were "all" the provable mistakes? The one about the journal? Was there anything else?
Because otherwise, everyone here knows the EUA is a sham. That's not "drinking Kool-Aid", that's common sense.
See, we know that experimental gene therapy isn't the answer to something that isn't really an issue...or shouldn't be. For like 99.999% of the population.
"provable mistakes besides the journal" - as though that didn't matter. It was #1. #2 - the chloroquine study was statistically insignificant. An animal study on a small number of animals in 2005.No human study. A dead end. Of no relevance in light of the subsequent studies involving millions of humans in the 2020s. #3 The assumption that one coronavirus is exactly the same as another. "One coronavirus infects a few thousand, kills a few hundred. That's exactly the same as another one that infects hundreds of millions and kills millions." Out of hundreds of coronaviruses.
I repeat: I'm not talking to you. I'm talking to anyone who thinks you're making the least bit of sense.
"common sense" - that's the thing that tells you the Earth is flat and the Sun and Moon go around it. You only have to look up in the sky to see it. No need for Science. Congratulations! Anyone with a brain can see you're right there with the Flat Earthers.
"99.999% of the population" - A number out of someone's asshole. If 100 people get virus 2 of them will die. If you're young and healthy it won't be you, it'll be your Grandma or your cousin with the kidney transplant.
Glad you aren't talking to me. Don't respond any more then! No need to hear from you. You are bullshit, and you know it. Nobody on here buys it.