Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

6
Ancient Mystery Religion Archeology - Bill Cooper (youtu.be)
posted 4 years ago by DavidColeIntrepid 4 years ago by DavidColeIntrepid +8 / -2
9 comments share
9 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
▲ -1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice -1 points 4 years ago +2 / -3

Then you misunderstood. There is no "division" it's a growth.

What if the foundation for both growth/corruption is motion; which defines the balance of choice in-between? That choice represents ONEs few will of choice within ALL, and so whenever ONE consents to a suggestion by another ONE, he ignores adherence to ALL.

Within motion ONE only has two choices...sustaining self by adhering to ALL in motion (reality); or ignoring to do so by consenting to the suggested beliefs (fiction) from other ONEs.

While motion both grows and corrupts those within; ONEs choice of action need to be in adherence to the rules of motion (ALL) to sustain growth within self; while believing the suggestion of others causes corruption of self.

In short...suggestion requires consent by beleif; belief causes conflict of reason (truth vs false). The few control the many by division through suggestion, and they do so in exchange for consent by free will of choice from the many...who thanks to their choice of ignorance don't comprehend this, because belief (affixed) restricts comprehension of perceived motion.

(idolatry)...Lol, no

Nature does not use names; brands; idols to communicate information; what you perceive through your senses represents inspiration through the consequences of actions in motion. You perceive change; which inspires you to act; to adapt to it; which when chosen to adhered to builds your comprehension of what the perceived means.

On here; within digital suggested fiction; they offer avatars to mimic identity; voting to mimic choice; emoticons to mimic emotions; instant messaging to mimic adaptation, communities to mimic unity, choice of information to mimic perception; audio and video to mimic senses; guidelines to mimic authority and so on.

That's all under the umbrella of transhumanism; which aims to exchange the 1 (natural reality) with the 0 (digital controlled fiction) by means of suggestion to corrupt our comprehension.

Within reality you are ONE within ALL under the laws of nature; but they tricked you to believe that you are the name your parents gave you; which for the few who control the many, represents a corporate straw-man identity; which they own through the birth certificate, and which tricks you to live your life "in the name of" a corporate (from corpus; corpse) dead legal entity. That's all under maritime admiralty law (piracy laws); which operate underneath common law; which operate underneath the laws of men; which operates underneath the laws of nature.

They only tell us about false idols; not that the act of believing aka mentally holding onto assumptions, contradicts the reality of motion; which makes all beliefs idolatry; including all languages...including our ego; the inner monologue; formed by language based assumptions of reality; which is tempting us nonstop to ignore motion for assumption aka that which is for that which was (memory) or could be.

Everyone makes judgements. It's part of life. Do you not "judge" where you pass your bowels?

What if choice of action isn't judgment (conflict between agreeing and disagreeing aka reason); but individual responsibility over self; which leads to consequences of actions representing collective responsibility for ALL?

When you comprehend that you only have two choices...adherence to self sustenance (need) or ignorance thereof (want), then you should comprehend that ignorance isn't disagreement with reality; but self destructive ignorance to adhere to the sustenance of self.

Nature doesn't judge us; it sues both our choices within the function of self sustenance. Motion creates energy (recharge based on our adherence to self sustenance); energy creates motion (loss of potentiality; which the individual ignorance of potential feeds into). Both choices are needed to establish balance within motion aka momentum aka the ever changing moment we exist in.

"offer information in ignorance of inspiration"...Yo, dawg. What the fuck are talking about?

"Grass"...nature does not brand it as such; and yet all lifeforms (within range) can perceive what it communicates. The looks, smell, taste, sound; feel of it and how it interacts with everything else is what we all perceive...this is inspiration, that when adapted to builds ONEs comprehension (potential) of ALL perceived (potentiality).

"Grass" as we brand it becomes information that requires suggestion in exchange for consent by free will of chocie to believe the offered suggestion by another ONE..."this is grass" causes "I believe/don't believe you"; which causes "This is grass...no, this is hay...no, this is food...no, this a toilet for dogs etc." aka the conflict of reason; causes by consent to beleif in fiction (suggested idols/fiction in ignorance of motion/reality).

ALL offers inspiration to each ONE; only another ONE can suggest information.

Inspiration demands adaptation; based on need for self sustenance; information demands consent to belief; based on want aka temptation luring towards death.

Nature does not require beliefs; beliefs ignore nature/motion/reality. True/false are not natural states; they represents a fiction in ignorance of reality (motion).

Again...need over want; inspiration over information and implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false). Try to disprove it for yourself and acknowledge how your beliefs will prevent you from doing so...your free will of choice holds these beliefs in place to restrict your comprehension. Believing/not believing me will not help you out of this. It's your choice of action as ONE within ALL.

I represents both inspiration and information (temptation) to you...you choose how to act upon it.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy