Life is not a game; it represents the ultimate price...ONEs temporary free will of choice to evaluate the ongoing existence of ALL. There's no higher value than evaluation, and yet mankind seeks outcomes; while ignoring that inception already defines death (within motion).
the most irritating
IR'RITATE, verb transitive [Latin irrito; in and ira, wrath.] - "to excite heat". The resistance of (magnetic) momentum to (electric) motion causes the friction that generates the "most" heat; which is why we (liquid based) are needed for cooling.
sophist in Philosophy 101
I stay clear of idolatry and I don't love wisdom (philosophy) either; I build comprehension through adaptation to inspiration.
Do you use noodles or those Russian bread alphabet letters?
Blah blah blah
Did you knew that the alleged origin of that is 'yada; yada; yada' from our favorite tribe of sarcastic ankle-biters? Where did you got that phrase from?
Isn't it coincidental that whenever one uses reason (truth vs false) to go to the bottom of things; one runs into contradictions all over the place? Meanwhile implication (if/then) as taught through the so called talmud makes assumptions so way less conflict oriented.
Life is not a game; it represents the ultimate price...ONEs temporary free will of choice to evaluate the ongoing existence of ALL. There's no higher value than evaluation, and yet mankind seeks outcomes; while ignoring that inception already defines death (within motion).
IR'RITATE, verb transitive [Latin irrito; in and ira, wrath.] - "to excite heat". The resistance of (magnetic) momentum to (electric) motion causes the friction that generates the "most" heat; which is why we (liquid based) are needed for cooling.
I stay clear of idolatry and I don't love wisdom (philosophy) either; I build comprehension through adaptation to inspiration.
Do you use noodles or those Russian bread alphabet letters?
Did you knew that the alleged origin of that is 'yada; yada; yada' from our favorite tribe of sarcastic ankle-biters? Where did you got that phrase from?
Nice. So the so called jewish "wiktionary"; while also quoting from the so called jewish "Washington Post" has the oldest date of reference at 1895, while the so called jewish "google" offers us activity for 1602 ... https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=yada&year_start=1500&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3#
Isn't it coincidental that whenever one uses reason (truth vs false) to go to the bottom of things; one runs into contradictions all over the place? Meanwhile implication (if/then) as taught through the so called talmud makes assumptions so way less conflict oriented.
Anyway; yada; yada; yada... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkXhGFpEB-E