"Today on TRUNEWS, host Edward Szall looks at the latest UK report showing that a majority of those that receive the second dose of the COVID vaccine could end up being dead by the end of summer; Mamalitas are rising up to protect their children from the stupid virus; President Biden says that vaccines are your patriotic duty. Edward Szall, Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate (04/30/21)"
The model assumes that 95% of people will be vaccinated by the time the second spike of hospitalizations and death occurs. (on page 23). So logically the percentage of vaccinated people in that spike if much higher.
In the hospital admissions graph, the unvaccinated make up almost half or the total number, even though in that model they are only 5% of the population, meaning that vaccinated people are less likely to get sick.
The graph does not imply that vaccines cause the hospitalizations and deaths, only that they are not 100% effective in preventing it.
Unless the vaccinated have nanomachines that could get them killed in 1 finger snap (by a bunch of cowards that can't even take Iran down, that is) then I don't think so.
Look up Theragrippers. Nanotech developed by Johns Hopkins for "controlled release drug delivery" that may be inserted via the nasal swabs. Supposedly they can be activated through 5g. Would explain why they shove the swabs all the way up to the membrane between the nasal cavity and brain when that is NOT needed. Cheek swab should have been all that was needed.
Vids are now showing "moving" threads on some swabs AND on some masks.
OK? Already that was accounted for, right below the graphs themselves on page 21. Either way you phrase it, at the end of the day, they result in the same thing.
Examining the constituent components within the relaxation wave is important for understanding the
action of the vaccine and where to focus public health efforts. The top panels show the components
of the relaxation wave over time: those that have not been vaccinated are in red, those receiving
one dose are in green and those that have received two doses are in blue. Darker colours
correspond to younger age groups (under 50) while the lighter colours correspond to the older age
groups (above 80).
The relaxation wave in both hospital admission and deaths is dominated by those that have
already received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave
respectively.
This dominance can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such
that vaccine failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals. If the vaccine
generates a higher efficacy against severe illness than in our default model (cf green line in Figure
2.10), then both the relative and absolute size of the blue regions would decrease.
The term "vaccine failures" is used to describe their cause of death.
Right. So why will the third wave kill 70% of the vaccinated, while the first and second wave only killed 00.03% of the unvaccinated? Dave. You need to wake the fuck up.
Here's the article where the headline is sourced from: https://greatgameindia.com/third-wave-two-vaccines-deaths/ As well as the PDF: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/spi-m-o-summary-of-further-modelling-of-easing-restrictions-roadmap-step-2-31-march-2021
The model assumes that 95% of people will be vaccinated by the time the second spike of hospitalizations and death occurs. (on page 23). So logically the percentage of vaccinated people in that spike if much higher. In the hospital admissions graph, the unvaccinated make up almost half or the total number, even though in that model they are only 5% of the population, meaning that vaccinated people are less likely to get sick. The graph does not imply that vaccines cause the hospitalizations and deaths, only that they are not 100% effective in preventing it.
Unless the vaccinated have nanomachines that could get them killed in 1 finger snap (by a bunch of cowards that can't even take Iran down, that is) then I don't think so.
Yeah even if it was a timed decay that destroys the vaccinated bodies, they wouldn't all drop dead at the same time.
Look up Theragrippers. Nanotech developed by Johns Hopkins for "controlled release drug delivery" that may be inserted via the nasal swabs. Supposedly they can be activated through 5g. Would explain why they shove the swabs all the way up to the membrane between the nasal cavity and brain when that is NOT needed. Cheek swab should have been all that was needed.
Vids are now showing "moving" threads on some swabs AND on some masks.
Fun times!
There is a very huge important difference between "will kill 70% of vaccinated people" and "70% of deaths willl be vaccinated people."
OK? Already that was accounted for, right below the graphs themselves on page 21. Either way you phrase it, at the end of the day, they result in the same thing.
The term "vaccine failures" is used to describe their cause of death.
Wow. and you watched that entire 90 minute video in the 15 minutes between it being posed and you replying did you?
I'll tell this, I skimmed over it in 2 minutes, and I can already tell you didn't watch a single second of it.
I already read the report. If 100% of people get vaccinated then 100% of the people who die from covid will be vaccinated. It's not that hard.
How can they die if covid if they have been vaccinated? They should be immune.
So what's the point of it then?
Right. So why will the third wave kill 70% of the vaccinated, while the first and second wave only killed 00.03% of the unvaccinated? Dave. You need to wake the fuck up.