.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
.
That's my point I av no eye dear
Male circumcision:
-only foreskin removed.
-can still achieve erection.
-can still ejaculate.
-nearly fully functional afterwards.
-slightly harder to masturbate (not a bad thing, necessarily).
-glans stays intact (majority of nerve concentration).
-sex is enjoyable and can achieve orgasm.
Female mutilation:
-glans and surrounding skin are sliced and diced and/or removed entirely.
-erections difficult or impossible (healthy females do have erections, so please).
-ejaculation is painful or impossible.
-stimulation is painful or impossible.
-orgasm is painful or impossible.
-sex is not nearly as enjoyable if at all.
-victim becomes an object for sex and otherwise.
Probably some other stuff.
Every society that practices FGM also circumcises their boys. For a given culture, the methods and conditions are the same. Tribes in the middle of nowhere in Africa that cut girls with dirty glass do the same to boy's foreskin. Wealthier Muslim countries such as Egypt and Malaysia have both done in a hospital by doctors. FGM is not always done to prevent women from having sex, nor is it always done in a heinous and barbaric way.
For example, last year a doctor in Michigan was acquitted of cutting several young girls belonging to the Dawoodi Bohra sect. It was the first, and last, case of the 1996 Federal anti-FGM law. Their method (performed in a clinic) is just a tiny nick on the clitoral hood, leaving otherwise fully fuctional genitalia.
Sounds like propergand from the west. Have you spoken to girls not in the west who have had this treatment/traditions?
So it OK to injury boys in the west but not black girls in the rest of the world you say. I think I just realised that white supremacists is a real thing.
And its also OK to mutilate baby boys ?
Did you copy and past it or you have a interest? Do you think women are victims or the guilty party's in this?
Are you brainwashed? We cherish our women and girls and we do not attempt to “own” them unlike how you people prefer to subjugate your women and girls due to the tendency of your males to be weak and fragile when they become “men”.
Aside: your males are probably weak because Mohammad himself was a weak scared little boy (almost like a girl) throughout his life.
Dude I'm English
Women like nancy or maxine? The fat ass pussy singer?
Don't own. What's the wedding ring all about? Put a ring on it?
Why is it OK to hurt the babies boy in the USA? Or Israel or the Muslim world?
You seam to think men are the ones chooping up women? It's not.
Take out your emotions and hate and re read what iv said.
In the US, the popularity of circumcision dates back 140 years to Dr Lewis Sayre, one of the founders of the American Medical Association, says David Gollaher author of Circumcision: A History of the World's Most controversial surgeries
So one guy has not got millions of parents to cut of there sons for skin.
Wow now that's amazing.
Been with loads of women. Had a thing for escorts and travelling. Not now but What do you mean?
The glans (head) is meant to be a semi-internal organ, protected from friction and kept moist by the foreskin.
Many guys, especially straight men, are oblivious to the damage that circumcision has caused. They don't realize that the two-toned color of the shaft, brown rings of the cut line, or mistakes like skin bridges and adhesions are not normal.