Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

3
Time lapse photo from the Celestial Equator. Makes absolutely no sense on a spinning globe the camera would capture stars moving in both directions it is impossible on an oblate spheroid. Will link in the comments what is happening. https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap071208.html (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 4 years ago by FortheGenerations 4 years ago by FortheGenerations +11 / -8
21 comments download share
21 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (21)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– Ask_Dave 3 points 4 years ago +6 / -3

That is an ultra wide angle EF-S 10-22mm lens. You are seeing the distortion in the lens.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FortheGenerations [S] 1 point 4 years ago +3 / -2

Funny you're just going to hop on here and try to whisk this away with camera distortion, pathetic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Ask_Dave -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

But that's exactly what it is. That's why the trails in the center of the lens look straight. Lens distortion is maximized in the corners.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– FortheGenerations [S] 2 points 4 years ago +3 / -1

Go watch the second video of stellarium app video.. it's how it looks at the celestial Equator

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– FlatSmurf 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

This is awesome. Love how it draws all the cultists out saying its camera distortion. Ahahahaha.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FortheGenerations [S] 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

The above photo is a real image taken directly from NASA's own website

First link: Two opposite rotations of stars with no nightly parralax is only possible on a stationary enclosed flat earth

Second link: . Stellarium Demonstration of the stars rotations as observed from the equator. Stellarium app is universally known as being very accurate with their models, so accurate you can connect your telescope to it and use the app to locate celestial bodies with extreme precision with less than 1 second of delay. May take a moment to finish uploading

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ -1 ▼
– Clobro -1 points 4 years ago +2 / -3

Ummm are we seeing time lapse camera distortion?... Yet some how flatearthtards pin this some how to the earth being flat?!?... Yikes smells desperate.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– FortheGenerations [S] 0 points 4 years ago +2 / -2

Watch the second video. Not distortion..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– FlatSmurf 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Clobro is either a complete dumb ass with an extremely low IQ....OR...he is just playing retarded and knows its flat and motionless. I'm voting for number 2.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– FortheGenerations [S] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I'll go two as well

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– deleted -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2
▲ -2 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid -2 points 4 years ago +3 / -5

You are the only thing here that "goes both ways" faggot. It's a simple long exposure photograph. Anybody that can spell the word "camera" and color inside the lines knows what the fuck it is. Bitch made shill.

Go log into your alt, xavier faggot

permalink save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– Contramundum -2 points 4 years ago +1 / -3

Certainly a lot of flat earthers here now, not sure why. People say this is camera distortion from the type of camera it is which is of course testable so if you really want to prove that what you say is true than test it and share the results. Most flat earthers have never done any of these so called experiments to prove it but are convinced it's true based on the words of others. That's not how science works and if you want us to believe you than telling us to go do an experiment to prove you're right is absurd as you need to do it first and record your results so that the scientific process can work.

If it is just camera distortion it doesn't matter where the picture is taken you should see similar results so not being able to get to the celestial equator would make no difference so you only need a camera with a similar lens and then take a time lapsed photo.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1
▲ 0 ▼
– Contramundum 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Modern science being unreliable does not prove that science done centuries ago that led people to believe that the earth was a globe way before space travel was even imagined is unreliable. That's false equivalency. The burden of proof for a flat earth is on those trying to prove it but telling me to go and prove it is not actually proof and when I have two different people claiming to have done the experiment and get different results than I'll just remain neutral but for practical purposes stick to the model that has been working for longer and with fewer assumptions.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– FortheGenerations [S] -1 points 4 years ago +2 / -3

The truth is contagious is why.. You can go prove yourself there is no curvature. It's really that simple.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Contramundum 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

I can go build a rocket and exit the atmosphere or travel to the arctic? Or maybe get a high power laser and do the sea level test, or telescope and a friend in a boat on the ocean? I can do none of those things as I don't have access to any resources for that and astronomical data can be interpreted mathematically both ways, though a globe model requires far fewer assumptions to work mathematically than a flat model.

I don't particularly care either way and I don't have the time or resources to test it personally; if you do than perform the tests and record your results otherwise there's nothing here scientific just conjecture based off of photo and video which can easily be explained away with far fewer assumptions than an entire flat earth model so to support it you'll need to perform the tests and follow the science. I'd love to learn a crazy truth about our world like a flat earth or whatever else but there needs to be sufficient scientific evidence that can be verified but the majority of people spreading the theory have little evidence and most people who consume it don't even verify it because most of us don't actually have access to the resources to test personally.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FortheGenerations [S] 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

You can go toil through Google earth images and find supporting evidences although not official proof it is indirect evidence because the people taking the photographs are generally just unsuspecting tourists not flat earthers.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy