Certainly a lot of flat earthers here now, not sure why. People say this is camera distortion from the type of camera it is which is of course testable so if you really want to prove that what you say is true than test it and share the results. Most flat earthers have never done any of these so called experiments to prove it but are convinced it's true based on the words of others. That's not how science works and if you want us to believe you than telling us to go do an experiment to prove you're right is absurd as you need to do it first and record your results so that the scientific process can work.
If it is just camera distortion it doesn't matter where the picture is taken you should see similar results so not being able to get to the celestial equator would make no difference so you only need a camera with a similar lens and then take a time lapsed photo.
Modern science being unreliable does not prove that science done centuries ago that led people to believe that the earth was a globe way before space travel was even imagined is unreliable. That's false equivalency. The burden of proof for a flat earth is on those trying to prove it but telling me to go and prove it is not actually proof and when I have two different people claiming to have done the experiment and get different results than I'll just remain neutral but for practical purposes stick to the model that has been working for longer and with fewer assumptions.
I can go build a rocket and exit the atmosphere or travel to the arctic? Or maybe get a high power laser and do the sea level test, or telescope and a friend in a boat on the ocean? I can do none of those things as I don't have access to any resources for that and astronomical data can be interpreted mathematically both ways, though a globe model requires far fewer assumptions to work mathematically than a flat model.
I don't particularly care either way and I don't have the time or resources to test it personally; if you do than perform the tests and record your results otherwise there's nothing here scientific just conjecture based off of photo and video which can easily be explained away with far fewer assumptions than an entire flat earth model so to support it you'll need to perform the tests and follow the science. I'd love to learn a crazy truth about our world like a flat earth or whatever else but there needs to be sufficient scientific evidence that can be verified but the majority of people spreading the theory have little evidence and most people who consume it don't even verify it because most of us don't actually have access to the resources to test personally.
You can go toil through Google earth images and find supporting evidences although not official proof it is indirect evidence because the people taking the photographs are generally just unsuspecting tourists not flat earthers.
Certainly a lot of flat earthers here now, not sure why. People say this is camera distortion from the type of camera it is which is of course testable so if you really want to prove that what you say is true than test it and share the results. Most flat earthers have never done any of these so called experiments to prove it but are convinced it's true based on the words of others. That's not how science works and if you want us to believe you than telling us to go do an experiment to prove you're right is absurd as you need to do it first and record your results so that the scientific process can work.
If it is just camera distortion it doesn't matter where the picture is taken you should see similar results so not being able to get to the celestial equator would make no difference so you only need a camera with a similar lens and then take a time lapsed photo.
Modern science being unreliable does not prove that science done centuries ago that led people to believe that the earth was a globe way before space travel was even imagined is unreliable. That's false equivalency. The burden of proof for a flat earth is on those trying to prove it but telling me to go and prove it is not actually proof and when I have two different people claiming to have done the experiment and get different results than I'll just remain neutral but for practical purposes stick to the model that has been working for longer and with fewer assumptions.
The truth is contagious is why.. You can go prove yourself there is no curvature. It's really that simple.
I can go build a rocket and exit the atmosphere or travel to the arctic? Or maybe get a high power laser and do the sea level test, or telescope and a friend in a boat on the ocean? I can do none of those things as I don't have access to any resources for that and astronomical data can be interpreted mathematically both ways, though a globe model requires far fewer assumptions to work mathematically than a flat model.
I don't particularly care either way and I don't have the time or resources to test it personally; if you do than perform the tests and record your results otherwise there's nothing here scientific just conjecture based off of photo and video which can easily be explained away with far fewer assumptions than an entire flat earth model so to support it you'll need to perform the tests and follow the science. I'd love to learn a crazy truth about our world like a flat earth or whatever else but there needs to be sufficient scientific evidence that can be verified but the majority of people spreading the theory have little evidence and most people who consume it don't even verify it because most of us don't actually have access to the resources to test personally.
You can go toil through Google earth images and find supporting evidences although not official proof it is indirect evidence because the people taking the photographs are generally just unsuspecting tourists not flat earthers.