Bombshell testimonial reveals that George Floyd did not die of drug overdose
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Well, anything? So far you have only produced some racists rants. Present some facts, please.
The word nigger ain't racist. It is a word. It isn't hate speech. It is free speech. Racism is an action not your feelings. Where calling me racist is so hurtful. You dumb nigger.
What are you babbling about? Toxicology means whatever amounts are considered, affect the outcome. My example was alcoholics same with drug users being unable to drive from being breathalyser tested. There is no resistance to a reading stating their toxicology. This is variable per drunk, perhaps some can take more before a reading, but the limit set means there is a severe reaction impairing their ability. That fucking dumb argument by that drunk coroner, throws out the breathalyser, suggesting there is no toxicology because the drug user had a resistance to intake. Bullshit. He had a huge amount in his system potentially fatal. Like the drunk killed in a car crash. Being drunk killed them. They couldn't drive. How therefore should a cop treat the druggie? They would die of a heart attack anyway. Massive internal damage on their organs huge amounts in their system. Being on drugs killed the druggie, not the same restraint done on everybody else causing no death. Of course there might have been negligence but it wasn't manslaughter when the druggie drops dead regardless. Do I agree with the cops. Not the argument. I don't persay agree with the restraint used. But it has been used before drop dead druggie croaked. He resisted arrest and was a frothing crackhead. What can they do. Certainly not get done for manslaughter, it wasn't their intent. It wasn't even accidental. Because it hasn't happened prior in the restraint used, but perhaps that restraint has previously caused injury. Not the debate.The fault was from the druggie.
So again I ask: elaborate on this. How do you know? What is your expertise? Why does your knowledge supercede that of a trained forensic expert?
Have you reviewed the evidence that is being discussed at the trial? Why do you come to another conclusion than the expert witness and on what basis?
Less rants, more facts, please.
Or just admit that you are just a dumb loudmouth and don't know what the fuck you are talking about and are just making shit up.
That is much more likely than you being some kind of expert with access to evidence that private citizens don't have access to.
The only person ranting is yourself, you are trolling me with bullshit, because you are as thick as a piece of excrement.
This is because you are foreign. You have lost the ability to communicate. What is my expertise on a forum. I presented an argument. You dumb nigger. An argument you haven't answered in any other regard apart from being a mindless stupid trolling nigger. Asking me my professional experience on a forum. That is really dumb. My experience speaks for itself. I have the ability to put forward an argument. Something a real dumb nigger like yourself hasn't done. Instead you have tried to troll my argument. By failing to answer it. Where is your reply outside of an assumption that mysteriously I have to provide some credentials to a stupid nigger like yourself. I owe you nothing nigger. What I say means nothing towards the outcome of this press. It was simply a point of debate. A point of debate you haven't debated except in retarded nigger stupidity. Childish dumb incomprehensible ranting gibberish.
Where is your counter argument towards why the toxicology levels mean an amount in the bloodstream that is otherwise clearly the cause of death. In every other instance. Like the drunk crashing the car. What is the cause of death. Car crash, or the toxicology in the bloodstream. Hint the toxicology is. This why people are still driving cars. Not everybody crashes them. The same with a heart attack being that cause in a car crash.
The toxicology has been disregarded here in this press by a drunk coroner ruling out that cause. You have had no argument to this. It is conspiratorial. You dumb nigger. You are ignorant.
The cause of death wasn't kneeling on the neck. It was the drugs in his bloodstream causing a heart attack. If you read the press presented. His bloodstream had the toxicology, a huge amount of intake, where drugs were in his bloodstream, and his internal organs were clearly damaged, and also by sustained drug use. There is no resistance to organ failure, they fail. Drug users die sooner than everybody else, because of a direct result of their addiction, their organs fail. Heath Ledger he takes more or less the same cocktail of drugs he had every other knight in rehearsal, but he died because of organ failure. It eventually killed him. No resistance. Toxicology rules Ledger died of drugs. They caused organ failure.
Sure this situation was heightened by the arrest, it caused his blood pressure to climb. How are cops supposed to handle it? There is a crack head resisting arrest. They use the same technique they have used prior on everybody else, it was legal until this case, too restrain him. Then druggie drop dead George croaks his last Floyd. How is it their fault for not being medical professionals and instead restraining a maniac. A frothing lunatic druggie who needed open valve heart surgery because he was a walking heart attack. Read his rap sheet.
Nice wall of text.
I have asked you to present your evidence and instead you go on another baseless rant.
You have nothing to present, just admit it. Literally everything you claim is made up with no basis in facts.
How fucking pathetic does one have to be to write all this bullshit instead of admitting that your opinion is based on wishful thinking and not facts.
Go back to school and learn how to present an argument you ignorant child.