I was so upset at first that trump set us up on the 6th Jan to get our guns. But now I'm questioning if it's a good thing, once the forced vaccine start. I don't want to many people around my with guns, once the taxing normal people out of cars, plains and then food, I don't want to many people to have guns then. Did trump do this to help us in the dark winter coming.?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (178)
sorted by:
Sorry, this is my mistake. I should’ve been more clear. You’re conflating “supporting the NRA” with “supporting the Constitution and natural law,” so I ignored your claim and explicitly replied regarding Trump’s (lack of) support for gun ownership itself. I then continued explaining that the NRA helped write the NFA, showing that they have no intention whatsoever of supporting the Constitution and natural law.
I’ve no doubt that he supports the NRA, since they’ve never done anything but acquiesce to gun confiscation.
Yeah, and I replied to that, too.
the DNC, GOP with help from the CIA, FBI and media managed...
THEY. HAVE. NO. LEGAL. AUTHORITY. TO. DO. THIS.
He had every single fucking right under the Constitution to arrest them all, for treason, and KILL THEM. THE DATA IS FUCKING PUBLIC. IT HAS BEEN PUBLIC FOR FIVE FUCKING YEARS. THEY OPENLY ADMITTED TO LYING FROM THE VERY BEGINNING. He did nothing. He didn’t even PRETEND to fight back. Fuck off with your retarded commie narrative. I’m not falling for that shit.
ZERO DEPORTATIONS.
ZERO ARRESTS OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.
Translation: “I don’t care about truth; I’m too lazy and stupid to think for myself, so I’ll go right ahead and keep worshipping the narrative created for me by foreigners who are literally exterminating my people from the face of the Earth.”
The USMCA is literally just NAFTA again. Have you read the damn thing? It contains 70% of the text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Why are you listening to what your enemies tell you?
But nothing happened there. The trade deficit just got worse. China did absolutely fucking nothing that the little piece of paper told them to do. And Trump did nothing to punish them.
Yep, literally exactly what I said the quote was. Expands it a little, even, where he gives his PERSONAL PREFERENCE for stealing guns outside the law (“I like taking the guns early.”). What’s the problem, yid? Can’t handle seeing unquestionable truth that destroys your narrative?
Translation: “I have absolutely no argument against what you said and am too weak, pathetic, cowardly, and brainwashed to talk about anything that my masters tell me not to talk about, so you’re wrong because I say so ha ha I win now. IGNORE REALITY. IGNORE REALITY. IGNORE REALITY.”
Thanks, yeah, fuck off. Don’t bother replying again. Both parties are owned by the same people. They all vote identically. One narrative is passed, always, by everyone. There is never any resistance. THERE IS NEVER ANY REPEAL OF THESE LAWS ONCE PASSED. One message. One narrative. One plan. They do exactly what their owners say, every time, on every issue. Learn what controlled opposition is.
When the House or Senate of the United States Congress–a body notorious for its partisanship, real and pretend–passes a bill or resolution 435-0 or 100-0 in favor of the jewish people or Israel… several bills and statements, in fact; a whole slew of them… that looks something suspiciously like “total control.”
You don’t have an argument. No one gets elected in the United States without worshipping jews. They openly brag about it. End of fucking story.
Except I don’t care about things that:
The Republican Party is not “right-wing,” “conservative,” or “traditionalist.” Words have definitions. Objective truth exists. Their voting history shows they are internationalist, interventionist, socialist, universalist, anti-protectionist, and anti-white. You want to run through the goddamn voting history? Or can I save my time and effort since you’re already too damn brainwashed by this false dichotomy to give a shit about what the truth is. I really don’t want to take an hour, pull something together, and have you keep spamming zionist neoconservative civic nationalist talking points.
Psst, I don’t give a shit. Read the RNC platform sometime (fun fact: to be in the Republican Party, you have to abide by the platform). And who runs the committee? Three goddamn guesses.
Of course you don't.
You are a Jew pretending to be Christian.
You lie at every opportunity.
The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.
Yeah, you are the Jew. You told me to kill myself for fighting against the ZOG. You have "given up". You act like a Christian, but you are not.
Too bad for you!
Goal posts shifted - check.
"I love the NRA, I love the second amendment" Newsweek, May 2016 in case you missed it. Or perhaps you missed one of the many many rallies where he repeated this statement. I'm beginning to think facts don't matter to you.. but lets push on and see, shall we?
Do you have any idea what you are actually saying right now? The DNC and GOP are the two largest parties to occupy Congress and Senate(the legislative branch). It is the duty of CONGRESS to make laws, NOT THE DUTY OF THE PRESIDENT TO RULE BY EXECUTIVE ORDER DECREE.
Furthermore, it is the duty of the Department of Justice to enforce the laws created by CONGRESS and these laws are ruled on by the COURTS (the judicial branch).
Your problem lays with the Legislative and Judicial branches bud, nor the Executive branch under Trump. But you know this, which means either you are intentionally trying to straw man Trump into blame or facts don't matter to you... but lets push on, shall we?
See my previous point.
See my previous point.
Glass houses and stones, amiright?
But lets push on...
It's gotta be hard shift these goal posts so much. In your previous comment you said "He seems more angry that Trump did absolutely nothing he promised to do, violated the law dozens of times, and refused to do his fucking job even when explicitly ordered to by the Constitution."
Did he, or did he not, promise to renegotiate NAFTA and trade deals with China? Did he, or did he not actually do this?
You actually linked an article about the trade deficit worsening... during 2020. Seriously? Maybe you might be able to think up another reason, why, in 2020 the trade deficit with China worsened?
Except, context matters doesn't it? (this is why I said the quote was out of context) Trump was commenting on Restraining Orders and not general gun ownership. And here you are on Conspiracies.win actually using The Hill as a source. But facts again... and you...
Wow.
You --> Facts --> not friends.
That much is clear.
Thanks for admitting you don’t know what you’re talking about.
True; false. Respectively, as proven by his behavior in office.
I couldn’t care less. I don’t give a shit. It doesn’t matter what he says. It matters what he did. He did nothing. Zero expansion of gun rights. Zero repeal of illegal gun laws. EXPANDED gun confiscation. Did. Nothing.
Sorry, it loses its effectiveness when I’ve already said the same about you–and proven it–and when you have no argument whatsoever.
Yeah, that’d be why I said it.
Funny how it’s only two, isn’t it? How all the other parties are either literal jokes or never get any traction and are physically prevented from showing up on stage, or in the media, or become visible in any capacity. Like, why are there only two parties when there are ~270,000,000 US citizens? Of all those people, how are there only two ideological positions to hold which present themselves sociopolitically? Really makes you think.
Or not, I guess. You seem fine with it.
We’re not talking about making laws. Congress has passed hundreds of unconstitutional laws. By law, they do not have to be followed. Trump followed them anyway.
Ah, so you disagree with all of Trump’s executive orders?
Yep, they don’t do that. That has long been proven. And Trump did nothing to make them do it, nor to punish people for not doing it. What’s your point?
Marbury v. Madison isn’t contextually Constitutional.
Nope, it lies with all three.
No, I have quite a few problems with Trump’s abject refusal to
I love a good irony.
“I like taking the guns early.” “Does anyone really think we’re going to deport anyone?” “Hillary has suffered enough.”
Blameless, huh.
You had no previous point. The law says illegals get deported. Trump deported zero net illegals during his term. Trump violated the law. Period, end of story. The law says that traitors (anywhere, in any position of power) get arrested. Trump arrested zero traitors. Trump violated the law. Period, end of story.
You had no previous point. Your strawman about “making laws” had nothing to do with anything that was said.
THEY. HAVE. NO. LEGAL. AUTHORITY. TO. DO. THIS.
Their entire narrative was a fabrication, admitted from the beginning. Trump had the duty (not the right, not the privilege; the duty) to arrest them for treason. He did nothing. Ever. At any time. About anything. Not just about “MUH LEKSHUN”; he did nothing whatsoever under the guise of “LOL THEY OBSTRUCT ME HA HA I CAN’T DO ANYTHING CUZ THEY SAY SO.” You have never read the Constitution, so you have no fucking clue what powers are enumerated to him. You have never read the laws currently on the books (legal or illegal), so you have no fucking clue what the executive is tasked to do.
I wouldn’t know; you’re the one doing it. You claimed NAFTA was renegotiated. It wasn’t. Trump lied. It was given a new name and put back into place. You know nothing about how communists operate, so you have no comprehension of this. “DURR IT DIFFERENT NAME SO IT DIFFERENT LAW HURR” is the extent of your “argument.”
Yep. Nope. Respectively. “IT NOT HE FAUUUUUUUUUUUULT” is not an argument, because it is, in fact, his fault for not obeying the law, not executing the law, and doing absolutely nothing to anyone who violated the law with regard to him or anyone else (except his masters; he loved going after anyone who questioned his masters).
Thanks for playing; the numbers are right there. Anyone can see the contents of the chart and its historical breadth.
Yes, they showed he cares even less about gun ownership than the talking points say.
Funny how he allowed all the illegal restraining order laws (you know, the ones that affect people with no criminality nor other mitigating factors) to remain on the books nationwide, though, isn’t it? It’s so fucking hilarious that you think I give a shit about your pilpul. You want people to get bogged down in these tiny niggles about a single quote because you can’t point to any instance of him repealing fake gun laws, enforcing said repeal, and expanding the recognition of the legal right of ownership (you know, like he promised), because he didn’t do it. He didn’t even need to promise to do it because his job is literally to obey only real laws and ignore fake ones, but he explicitly promised he would do it and he didn’t. The only response on your flow chart is “DURR HE OBSTRUCTED” but he wasn’t, because anyone who has actually read the laws knows that the obstruction had no legal authority.
Genetic fallacy. You failed. Try again.
Thanks for proving exactly what I said. To the fucking letter. No argument. Not even a response. You have nothing.
Translation: “You proved wrong every single word I said and my fee fees got hurt because the hero I’ve been worshipping for six years was exposed as a globalist fraud the entire time, but I’m too weak and pathetic to accept truth when it hurts my feelings, so I’ll project my inadequacies onto others.”
One
MORE
TIME!
PISS OFF, YOU FUCKING SHILL.
Holy fuck, you need a goddamn explanation for what every other living being on the fucking planet INNATELY COMPREHENDS? No wonder you act so retarded. You literally have physical brain damage, liberal. See, we wouldn’t have had to go through all this bullshit if you had actually had the balls to state your own beliefs in the first place. You didn’t, so you got humiliated for weeks for being too fucking pathetic to enumerate why “BAD MAN RONG CUZ I SAY SO.”
Supporting your own race above other races is both healthy and natural. A healthy society is monocultural and homogenous–that’s what forms a nation. Even at the community level, racial diversity strongly correlates with negative social effects. A lavishly funded study of over 30,000 participants by Dr. Robert D. Putnam of Harvard University showed that racial diversity in a community corresponds to:
Oops. Turns out you’re still objectively wrong, but at least you now have no excuse whatsoever to keep believing what you believe. Thing is, though? You will. You’re too weak to admit when you’re wrong, so you’ll keep spamming the same neocon bullshit until they kill you. Enjoy white genocide, dumb fuck.
I don’t know where you are, but I don’t post on The_Donald for a goddamn reason. None of them can be saved from their cult. You’re powerless everywhere else on this site, though.