it is entirely possible that an outer context exists which cannot be proven to exist
Let me put this into a different perspective...you can physically perceive that you exist; yet you can only mentally comprehend that your existence (life) is defined by a beginning (inception) and an end (death).
Now add motion as the foundation to existence...you represent ONE magnetic potential, within the momentum, of ALL electric potentiality. Your beginning was set into motion (inception); you're now perceiving the consequence of that action within motion (life) and since all actions have consequences within motion, your end (death) was already defined when the beginning (inception) was set.
You're in balance between two natural opposites (beginning and end; defined by motion), and as a potential, you perceive being physically in use; while only able to mentally comprehend the unused potentiality of the electric flow that sustains your magnetic existence.
Both body and mind in balance represents communication between ALL and ONE within motion. Whenever others speak about "prove" (from probo; to test) they only refer to the physical perception; not the mental comprehension.
divine
That's the inversion under a false authority (deity). Each of us is ONE within ALL; and ALL is ONE in energy. ONEs free will of chocie represents ONEs sole authority over self within ALL. They inverted this through suggestion of the opposite in exchange for consent by free will to "believe" them.
Instead of using reason to what I just wrote (conflict between belief in truth versus false); try to utilize implication (if/then) , which is in adherence to motion (as taught in the talmud btw).
This is the only part of that wall of text that actually matters.
You're too focused on the extraneous.
EXTRA'NEOUS, adjective [Latin extraneus.] - "Foreign; not belonging to a thing; existing without; not intrinsic".
ALL is ONE in energy. All existence coexists. There's no existence outside ALL existence, which would be a contradiction of itself.
I used to think like that.
Writing lots of software changed my perspective on that a bit.
The simulationists are correct in one regard, it is entirely possible that an outer context exists which cannot be proven to exist.
It is in that ambiguous outer context void that I entertain the possibility (even likelihood) of divinity.
Let me put this into a different perspective...you can physically perceive that you exist; yet you can only mentally comprehend that your existence (life) is defined by a beginning (inception) and an end (death).
Now add motion as the foundation to existence...you represent ONE magnetic potential, within the momentum, of ALL electric potentiality. Your beginning was set into motion (inception); you're now perceiving the consequence of that action within motion (life) and since all actions have consequences within motion, your end (death) was already defined when the beginning (inception) was set.
You're in balance between two natural opposites (beginning and end; defined by motion), and as a potential, you perceive being physically in use; while only able to mentally comprehend the unused potentiality of the electric flow that sustains your magnetic existence.
Both body and mind in balance represents communication between ALL and ONE within motion. Whenever others speak about "prove" (from probo; to test) they only refer to the physical perception; not the mental comprehension.
That's the inversion under a false authority (deity). Each of us is ONE within ALL; and ALL is ONE in energy. ONEs free will of chocie represents ONEs sole authority over self within ALL. They inverted this through suggestion of the opposite in exchange for consent by free will to "believe" them.
Instead of using reason to what I just wrote (conflict between belief in truth versus false); try to utilize implication (if/then) , which is in adherence to motion (as taught in the talmud btw).
That's just your perspective on it.
Life is continuous.