"In nomine" aka "in the name of" ; based on "in the beginning was the word..."
Now consider this...does nature use words to communicate information or does nature communicates inspiration to our senses (perception), so that our choice (free will) made upon them, builds our comprehension of information?
What if RELIGION, noun (Latin religio, from religo) - "to bind anew"; merely represents the industrialization of control by suggestion (consent by free will to offer made), and that words; brands; idols are representing offered fiction, that when consented to (by believing it) deceives us to ignore reality?
What if it's not about "what" one believes; but about "that" ONE consents to believe another ONEs offer, while ignoring the source of ALL information?
Try to use your consciousness to create a "new" thought without using the inspiration from ALL that already exists. You can't, because we cannot create; we can only transmute out of ALL that already exists.
ALL information is predefined; ONE lacks comprehension (potential) of what ALL perceived information (potentiality) means.
obeying authority
ALL represents the source of ALL information; communicated to ONEs perception in form of inspiration. Then ONE uses free will of choice to either adhere or ignore ALL offered, which leads to ONEs comprehension (potential).
What if another (((ONE))) offers (suggestion) information (fiction) to get ONE to consent to it (by believing), while ignoring ALL perceived inspiration for it?
What if ONE obeys (consents) to the false authority of another (((ONEs))) suggestions, while ignoring ONEs sole authority over self...the free will of choice within ALL?
word
What is a word? A definition made by ONE within ALL to other ONEs within ALL about what he believes ALL means. Every word represents a substitute (fiction) for ALL (reality), and upholding these words as beliefs, corrupts ONEs comprehension of ALL, to the beliefs; offered by another (((ONE))).
How does "grass" communicates itself to all other lifeforms; without anyone telling them that it's called "grass"? Could it be that nature does not name; brand; idolize what it sets into motion, because that affixed meaning would contradict the function of motion, which is ever changing?
The trick played here is way simpler than religions and revisionism; but way more fundamental. Words represent SPELL-craft; control through suggestion aiming at the maintenance of ignorance over reality (motion) in favor for fiction (belief).
history
The history you try to dig into to make sense of this world; represents in its entirety a suggested fiction to keep you ignorant. What's always missing in his-story? The main character of ALL reality...ONEself.
Try to use your consciousness to create a "new" thought without using the inspiration from ALL that already exists. You can't, because we cannot create; we can only transmute out of ALL that already exists.
Isn't this what Plato is trying to explain in his Allegory of the Cave? That MOST people will simply be told what things are, and use those tellings to understand the world, whereas the person who has freed himself from the cave can see things for what they truly are because rather than use the symbol/meaning given to you by another man (the ones casting shadows on the wall), you obtain your own symbol and meaning, which is a memory that is attached directly in a divine way between your brain and nature (without the middleman / programmed symbols and meaning). You derive the symbol and meaning directly from nature itself, not from a consensus of what other people think it means.
Or it's similar to what Mother Teresa said about us having two sources of water to pull from. One is by way of a waterworks system, a series of pipes and things feeding into our brain through our senses and what other people tell us. There is another source of water that springs from within.
Take for example all of the monsters and angels and demons imagined by people throughout history. They didn't need to "pull" these from any prior art. These were pulled from the "ALL" because the ALL is truly everything. Mind, thought, imagination, creation has no bounds. It is our act of imposing symbols and meaning which creates bounds. Undo the symbols, and once again it has no bounds. A magic spell can trap a genie, just as what the starry night spells to us, traps our soul in the body. Words are a suit we wear to give us the shape of what we think of is "human", take off the suit and see what you really are.
You derive the symbol and meaning directly from nature itself, not from a consensus of what other people think it means.
Yes. What the middleman offers is information in exchange for consent by believing it. Nature (energy in motion aka) represents information (energy aka the source of ALL information) and it uses motion, which segregates ALL (potentiality) into individual ONE (potential) to communicate inspiration to ONEs perception.
So...inspiration to perception (input); transmutation by choice into comprehended information (processing) and action (output); creating consequences (inspiration for others).
It's not just from "nature itself"; but the ALL information is being created (transmuted) within ONEself; through choice of adherence over ignorance to ALL. We cannot believe others; each ONE of us needs to use them as inspiration for the sustenance of self through ALL.
In other words...the sustenance of ONE (magnetic potential) requires channeling ALL (electric potentiality) through ONEself by choice of action within motion.
Allegory of the Cave
As simple as offer/consent defined by source. ALL represents the source for each ONE; so ONE within ALL cannot be the source for another ONE.
two sources of water to pull from
Notice the water/current/motion allegory used. ALL represents the flow of information fro each ONE within. ONEs choice to ignore this, means ignoring motion for affixed assumption (belief), which creates a fiction (belief) with the ignored reality (motion).
Motion defines the natural law "opposites must coexist; because they're defined by each others coexistence within motion", so ignorance of reality requires fiction the state of fiction aka the self imposed restriction of ONEs comprehension for ALL perceived reality.
One is by way of a waterworks system, a series of pipes and things feeding into our brain through our senses and what other people tell us.
Complexity (laws of men) hiding simplicity (laws of nature) through consent to suggestion (belief).
There is another source of water that springs from within.
ALL potentiality that ONE potential lacks comprehension of.
Take for example all of the monsters and angels and demons imagined by people throughout history.
His-story lacking which main character? ONEself. A suggestion; using endless allegory (complexity) to keep ONE ignorant of the simple foundation of natural law (defined by motion) underneath. Those who propagate his-story represents the farmhands for feeding the ignorance of the cattle (goyim) with fictitious fodder.
They didn't need to "pull" these from any prior art.
a) complexity (fiction) stacked onto simplicity (reality) aka the allegory for the Tower of Babel (babel referring to BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] Confusion; disorder. through suggestion of words aka SPELL-craft)
b) suggested inversion as the modus operandi to farm the self destruction of those who consent by free will of choice to ignorance towards self sustenance within ALL.
Mind, thought, imagination, creation has no bounds.
ONE represents a limited (magnetic) potential; within unlimited (electric) potentiality. Suggestion represents the main weapon to stifle potential from comprehending potentiality.
It is our act of imposing symbols and meaning which creates bounds.
Self restriction of comprehension by consent to suggestion.
Undo the symbols, and once again it has no bounds.
Not that easy, because our ego; the inner monologue represents a corruption of communication between ONE and ALL, based on believed words; brands; idols. We are the ONEs corrupting the instincts of our offspring right from the get go. We need to overcome language; because it endlessly tempts us to claim ownership over reality by proCLAIMing assumptions as truths.
Truth versus false represents the conflict of reason, which is also a corruption caused by consent to belief. The way to tackle that one is implication (if/then) instead of reason (truth vs false). This way you undermine all suggested conflicts.
traps our soul in the body.
Soul; spirit; animal...these are all inversions fro the same thing "to breathe" aka ONEs demanded adherence to ALL by struggling to uphold life over death aka adaptation to motion. It represents the survial instinct; the collective impulse that defines the value of life over death. Our main tool of inspiration needed to not fall for the temptation the pull of motion represents to those within.
Free will of choice is defined by balance between need (self sustenance) and want (ignorance) aka ONEs responsibility over the sole authority of self...free will. That's the non inverted morality as defined by the laws of nature within motion.
Words are a suit we wear
Yep; fiction in the name of reality. In nomine.
take off the suit and see what you really are
The responsibility over self after self sustenance is self discernment as ONE within ALL, which then leads to the comprehension of ALL being ONE in energy, which then offers ALL as inspiration to ONEs potential...if ONE chooses to not ignore acting upon it.
"In nomine" aka "in the name of" ; based on "in the beginning was the word..."
Now consider this...does nature use words to communicate information or does nature communicates inspiration to our senses (perception), so that our choice (free will) made upon them, builds our comprehension of information?
What if RELIGION, noun (Latin religio, from religo) - "to bind anew"; merely represents the industrialization of control by suggestion (consent by free will to offer made), and that words; brands; idols are representing offered fiction, that when consented to (by believing it) deceives us to ignore reality?
What if it's not about "what" one believes; but about "that" ONE consents to believe another ONEs offer, while ignoring the source of ALL information?
Try to use your consciousness to create a "new" thought without using the inspiration from ALL that already exists. You can't, because we cannot create; we can only transmute out of ALL that already exists.
ALL information is predefined; ONE lacks comprehension (potential) of what ALL perceived information (potentiality) means.
ALL represents the source of ALL information; communicated to ONEs perception in form of inspiration. Then ONE uses free will of choice to either adhere or ignore ALL offered, which leads to ONEs comprehension (potential).
What if another (((ONE))) offers (suggestion) information (fiction) to get ONE to consent to it (by believing), while ignoring ALL perceived inspiration for it?
What if ONE obeys (consents) to the false authority of another (((ONEs))) suggestions, while ignoring ONEs sole authority over self...the free will of choice within ALL?
What is a word? A definition made by ONE within ALL to other ONEs within ALL about what he believes ALL means. Every word represents a substitute (fiction) for ALL (reality), and upholding these words as beliefs, corrupts ONEs comprehension of ALL, to the beliefs; offered by another (((ONE))).
How does "grass" communicates itself to all other lifeforms; without anyone telling them that it's called "grass"? Could it be that nature does not name; brand; idolize what it sets into motion, because that affixed meaning would contradict the function of motion, which is ever changing?
The trick played here is way simpler than religions and revisionism; but way more fundamental. Words represent SPELL-craft; control through suggestion aiming at the maintenance of ignorance over reality (motion) in favor for fiction (belief).
The history you try to dig into to make sense of this world; represents in its entirety a suggested fiction to keep you ignorant. What's always missing in his-story? The main character of ALL reality...ONEself.
Isn't this what Plato is trying to explain in his Allegory of the Cave? That MOST people will simply be told what things are, and use those tellings to understand the world, whereas the person who has freed himself from the cave can see things for what they truly are because rather than use the symbol/meaning given to you by another man (the ones casting shadows on the wall), you obtain your own symbol and meaning, which is a memory that is attached directly in a divine way between your brain and nature (without the middleman / programmed symbols and meaning). You derive the symbol and meaning directly from nature itself, not from a consensus of what other people think it means.
Or it's similar to what Mother Teresa said about us having two sources of water to pull from. One is by way of a waterworks system, a series of pipes and things feeding into our brain through our senses and what other people tell us. There is another source of water that springs from within.
Take for example all of the monsters and angels and demons imagined by people throughout history. They didn't need to "pull" these from any prior art. These were pulled from the "ALL" because the ALL is truly everything. Mind, thought, imagination, creation has no bounds. It is our act of imposing symbols and meaning which creates bounds. Undo the symbols, and once again it has no bounds. A magic spell can trap a genie, just as what the starry night spells to us, traps our soul in the body. Words are a suit we wear to give us the shape of what we think of is "human", take off the suit and see what you really are.
Yes. What the middleman offers is information in exchange for consent by believing it. Nature (energy in motion aka) represents information (energy aka the source of ALL information) and it uses motion, which segregates ALL (potentiality) into individual ONE (potential) to communicate inspiration to ONEs perception.
So...inspiration to perception (input); transmutation by choice into comprehended information (processing) and action (output); creating consequences (inspiration for others).
It's not just from "nature itself"; but the ALL information is being created (transmuted) within ONEself; through choice of adherence over ignorance to ALL. We cannot believe others; each ONE of us needs to use them as inspiration for the sustenance of self through ALL.
In other words...the sustenance of ONE (magnetic potential) requires channeling ALL (electric potentiality) through ONEself by choice of action within motion.
As simple as offer/consent defined by source. ALL represents the source for each ONE; so ONE within ALL cannot be the source for another ONE.
Notice the water/current/motion allegory used. ALL represents the flow of information fro each ONE within. ONEs choice to ignore this, means ignoring motion for affixed assumption (belief), which creates a fiction (belief) with the ignored reality (motion).
Motion defines the natural law "opposites must coexist; because they're defined by each others coexistence within motion", so ignorance of reality requires fiction the state of fiction aka the self imposed restriction of ONEs comprehension for ALL perceived reality.
Complexity (laws of men) hiding simplicity (laws of nature) through consent to suggestion (belief).
ALL potentiality that ONE potential lacks comprehension of.
His-story lacking which main character? ONEself. A suggestion; using endless allegory (complexity) to keep ONE ignorant of the simple foundation of natural law (defined by motion) underneath. Those who propagate his-story represents the farmhands for feeding the ignorance of the cattle (goyim) with fictitious fodder.
a) complexity (fiction) stacked onto simplicity (reality) aka the allegory for the Tower of Babel (babel referring to BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] Confusion; disorder. through suggestion of words aka SPELL-craft)
b) suggested inversion as the modus operandi to farm the self destruction of those who consent by free will of choice to ignorance towards self sustenance within ALL.
ONE represents a limited (magnetic) potential; within unlimited (electric) potentiality. Suggestion represents the main weapon to stifle potential from comprehending potentiality.
Self restriction of comprehension by consent to suggestion.
Not that easy, because our ego; the inner monologue represents a corruption of communication between ONE and ALL, based on believed words; brands; idols. We are the ONEs corrupting the instincts of our offspring right from the get go. We need to overcome language; because it endlessly tempts us to claim ownership over reality by proCLAIMing assumptions as truths.
Truth versus false represents the conflict of reason, which is also a corruption caused by consent to belief. The way to tackle that one is implication (if/then) instead of reason (truth vs false). This way you undermine all suggested conflicts.
Soul; spirit; animal...these are all inversions fro the same thing "to breathe" aka ONEs demanded adherence to ALL by struggling to uphold life over death aka adaptation to motion. It represents the survial instinct; the collective impulse that defines the value of life over death. Our main tool of inspiration needed to not fall for the temptation the pull of motion represents to those within.
Free will of choice is defined by balance between need (self sustenance) and want (ignorance) aka ONEs responsibility over the sole authority of self...free will. That's the non inverted morality as defined by the laws of nature within motion.
Yep; fiction in the name of reality. In nomine.
The responsibility over self after self sustenance is self discernment as ONE within ALL, which then leads to the comprehension of ALL being ONE in energy, which then offers ALL as inspiration to ONEs potential...if ONE chooses to not ignore acting upon it.