I hope you're right, but I'm not holding my breath for SCOTUS to hear the case.
Since we lost Scalia they've been too chickenshit to rule on anything 2A, despite numerous obvious Constitutional violations in states like California that should have been struck down.
The beauty of all of this will come with the state v federal fight over federal nullification. Take a nullification law of 2a enforcement as an example.
Federal level will argue supremacy clause. Same state - let's say OK, for example, with both a 2a nullification law AND legalized marijuana dispensaries causes a tricky federal legal problem for CA and CO.
To enforce supremacy clause for guns, feds have to also unleash DEA on every lefty safe haven.
I really don't think the DS can see beyond their arrogance and hubris to understand how somewhere like OK, with 100% redder-than-red counties, would pass nullification of federal drug laws to long-con these assholes on guns.
That’s the thing that anti-gunners don’t really understand. People have been taking guns everywhere pretty much since guns were invented that could be safely tucked under a coat. There were no laws against it until the 19th Century, for the most part. Unsurprisingly, even with those laws in place, criminals kept carrying concealed guns anywhere they wanted because the odds of them getting caught with it were so small, but the law abiding stopped.
The very least, is that concealed carry laws give people who care about respecting the law, the option to do the same as what the criminals have always done.
The 9th Circus strikes again.
The most overturned Circuit of them all. I have a dim, but very real hope, that SCOTUS will do the right thing here and over turn them on this.
I hope you're right, but I'm not holding my breath for SCOTUS to hear the case.
Since we lost Scalia they've been too chickenshit to rule on anything 2A, despite numerous obvious Constitutional violations in states like California that should have been struck down.
Well, this is going to be stupid
The beauty of all of this will come with the state v federal fight over federal nullification. Take a nullification law of 2a enforcement as an example.
Federal level will argue supremacy clause. Same state - let's say OK, for example, with both a 2a nullification law AND legalized marijuana dispensaries causes a tricky federal legal problem for CA and CO.
To enforce supremacy clause for guns, feds have to also unleash DEA on every lefty safe haven.
I really don't think the DS can see beyond their arrogance and hubris to understand how somewhere like OK, with 100% redder-than-red counties, would pass nullification of federal drug laws to long-con these assholes on guns.
Or they could do what they always do and selectively enforce/rule.
Yeah. I expect that. but it does, or at least "should" create a great degree of havoc.
Should appeal
It’s the same story in Canada on everything the last couple years. The Judges just cuck to the government’s will.
That’s the thing that anti-gunners don’t really understand. People have been taking guns everywhere pretty much since guns were invented that could be safely tucked under a coat. There were no laws against it until the 19th Century, for the most part. Unsurprisingly, even with those laws in place, criminals kept carrying concealed guns anywhere they wanted because the odds of them getting caught with it were so small, but the law abiding stopped.
The very least, is that concealed carry laws give people who care about respecting the law, the option to do the same as what the criminals have always done.
Anti gunners love to use "wild west" as a negative phrase but just like now, the "wild west" was safer than cities.
Uh, how about a caption to the opinion?
https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/