Interesting point on the uncoupled nature of supply (population) and demand (positions) but I think I disagree. Which field any given laborer seeks employment is semi-elastic, for example machine shop welders might switch to underwater welding if a large demand was put on the naval/shipbuilding industry. Or a huffpost writer might finally take that coding bootcamp when they see the $200,000/year job offers.
So my point is just that while human population isn’t directly tied to labor demand, you could make the case that “populace trained for a position” is, atleast a lot more directly.
On topic, I heard that a SoS’er (Engels, who married into the Rothschildren) was the real driving force behind Marx’s theories, never really confirmed much about that though just because I’ve never seen much reason to dive deep into the origin of the commies.
Interesting point on the uncoupled nature of supply (population) and demand (positions) but I think I disagree. Which field any given laborer seeks employment is semi-elastic, for example machine shop welders might switch to underwater welding if a large demand was put on the naval/shipbuilding industry. Or a huffpost writer might finally take that coding bootcamp when they see the $200,000/year job offers.
So my point is just that while human population isn’t directly tied to labor demand, you could make the case that “populace trained for a position” is, atleast a lot more directly.
On topic, I heard that a SoS’er (Engels, who married into the Rothschildren) was the real driving force behind Marx’s theories, never really confirmed much about that though just because I’ve never seen much reason to dive deep into the origin of the commies.