Well, Alex Jones is the controlled opposition. So, even if he makes salient points about the vaccine, it's so those points can be diminished in the public sphere. I don't think he cares a whit about being "silenced", that's part and parcel of the job.
And honestly, I can't watch Alex Jones. Find him extremely fake, from the get go (I got lucky...first video of his I watched, he started fake crying...I'm like, nope, I'm out). Also thought he was Bill Hicks, from the start. Talked to my brother about it recently, and he almost became livid from me suggesting that they were the same.
Now, if I like conspiracies and find him repulsive, I can't imagine how someone would feel that doesn't like conspiracies and is sent to him or infowars. His delivery is probably influenced by NLP...if there's one thing I've noticed, NLP practitioners aren't shy about greatly varying the inflection and volume of their voice. Essentially he punctuates things in such a way as to make the listener feel specific emotions that he himself doesn't.
I can't disagree. Well said.Im probably wrong, but I see the jab as a #1 goal for luciferians, so to see alex advise against it tells me he cant be all bad, no?
Russell Brand says all kind of stuff that is against TPTB, but that doesn't mean a thing.
Same with Alex Jones. If there was no one out there at all against it, things would be fishy.
I would imagine that the luciferians as you say want that jab, but probably feel they can control the rest regardless. And they still need some people.
Reason (the conflict between truth versus false) allows those who offered the beliefs you reason about, to control both sides of every conflict through the use of contradiction, because it keeps the fictitious conflict among yourselves going, while others control the reality around you through your ignorance.
Your consent to believe in "truth" allows others to use "lies" against everyone, and your consent to reasoning about truth versus false, protects the actions of those who offered you both "truth" and "false" information.
It's not what you believe, but that you consent to believe the offer of another, that represents your choice to ignore reality for fiction.
Well, Alex Jones is the controlled opposition. So, even if he makes salient points about the vaccine, it's so those points can be diminished in the public sphere. I don't think he cares a whit about being "silenced", that's part and parcel of the job.
And honestly, I can't watch Alex Jones. Find him extremely fake, from the get go (I got lucky...first video of his I watched, he started fake crying...I'm like, nope, I'm out). Also thought he was Bill Hicks, from the start. Talked to my brother about it recently, and he almost became livid from me suggesting that they were the same.
Now, if I like conspiracies and find him repulsive, I can't imagine how someone would feel that doesn't like conspiracies and is sent to him or infowars. His delivery is probably influenced by NLP...if there's one thing I've noticed, NLP practitioners aren't shy about greatly varying the inflection and volume of their voice. Essentially he punctuates things in such a way as to make the listener feel specific emotions that he himself doesn't.
I was sitting here wondering what I was going to do with my cow, and you come along with offers of magic beans...
I can't disagree. Well said.Im probably wrong, but I see the jab as a #1 goal for luciferians, so to see alex advise against it tells me he cant be all bad, no?
Russell Brand says all kind of stuff that is against TPTB, but that doesn't mean a thing.
Same with Alex Jones. If there was no one out there at all against it, things would be fishy.
I would imagine that the luciferians as you say want that jab, but probably feel they can control the rest regardless. And they still need some people.
Reason (the conflict between truth versus false) allows those who offered the beliefs you reason about, to control both sides of every conflict through the use of contradiction, because it keeps the fictitious conflict among yourselves going, while others control the reality around you through your ignorance.
Your consent to believe in "truth" allows others to use "lies" against everyone, and your consent to reasoning about truth versus false, protects the actions of those who offered you both "truth" and "false" information.
It's not what you believe, but that you consent to believe the offer of another, that represents your choice to ignore reality for fiction.