Suggesting immorality to get the cattle back to the suggestion of morality...using contradictions (talmudic reasoning) to sustain reason aka the fictitious (in ignorance of reality) conflict between truth and false.

If one chooses immorality; one gets conflict. If one chooses morality; one gets conflict...supply and demand makes the merchants happy.

How about choosing order over chaos; need over want; adherence to self sustenance over ignorance thereof; ALL over another (((ones))) offers?

Between "sweet lies" and "truth hurts"...who maintains the balance? Read up the lyrics of Robert Palmer's "Sweet Lies"