As most of you know, most of "official" history is a lie. We have been subverted and fed false information since the days of the Roman Empire. What you are about to read is my interpretation of our past, based on extensive research and discernment. Hopefully, I can educate some of you, and welcome constructive criticism and questions! I will NOT humor trolls or pompous faggots that respond with some form of "AcKtYuAlLy".
Following the Great Deluge and the Epic of Gilgamesh, Canaan was home to some of the earliest human civilizations. It was first inhabited by Sumerians, who primarily worshipped a deity called El ("El" also became a title for all future Canaan supreme dieties). This was actually Enki, an Anunnaki king who took a liking to humanity. His subjects prayed to he and his large family for boons, like rain water and fertility. El/Enki is who we now refer to as "God". He was responsible for flooding the earth, which wiped out countless civilizations, including Atlantis. As centuries passed, the Sumerians gradually migrated outward, leaving Canaan to a tribal people known as Phoenicians. It's unclear where Enki went (space/Heaven?), but the Phoenicians (based in Carthage) began worshipping his brother, Enlil, more commonly known as Baal. Unlike El, Baal viewed humanity as critically-flawed vermin, and preferred using it for slave labor. He offered the same boons as El, but demanded animal and child sacrifices in return (Baal is asshoe). Rampant pedophilia was a biproduct of his followers viewing children as nothing but "offerings". This death cult became known as the Tribe of Dan.
As time went on, the Canaanites branched out to Mesopotamia, establishing Babylon as their capitol. There, Baal became Moloch, and his depiction changed from a humanoid to an owl (look up Bohemian Grove). Similarly, Enki was changed to Yahweh. These Babylonian Baalists were what we now refer to as Hebrews (originally called Hyksos). The story of Abraham and Isaac is directly linked to Baalism. In the original story, Abraham actually sacrifices his son. It was altered after the fall of Babylon, and the rise of Judaism. Mesopotamia was also the birthplace of banking ("Money Magick"). However, back then, it was a primitive concept, and wasn't widely used for subversion.
On a quest for expansion, Babylonian Hebrews attempted to invade Egypt. Here, a ton of wild shit happened, including: the Plagues of Egypt, the eruption of Mt. Thera, the Tempest Stele, and the Tablets of the Law ("I am that I am." - El/Yahweh/Jehova/God). Another long-forgotten aspect of Abrahamic (Sumerian) faiths is that God actually has a female polarity, Shekhina. This is what Christians know as the "Holy Spirit", and is responsible for sending us the Tablets of the Law, on Mt. Sinai (Great Pyramid). She isn't a physical organism, but a maternal cosmic entity that embodies God's presence on Earth (remember that these beings are insanely advanced, and have omnipotent properties). Following the 10 Commandments energizes her, resulting in the spread of peace and harmony (high quantum frequencies). After numerous bloody battles, the Hebrews failed to take Egypt, and Pharaoh Ahmose I expelled them from his land. This is what Exodus actually was. The Hebrews were the aggressors.
Abrahamites will be pleased to know that Genesis (Sumerian story of creation) remains almost unaltered, with the only notable differences being that God was (in ORIGINAL Hebrew) described as being both male and female (Enki and Shekhina?), and the names Adam and Eve were retroactively added, based on names of Pharaohs.
Egypt used to be the Japan of the world (technology-wise). Cosmology and numerology were central to Egyptian culture. It's where most famous planetary dieties originated, like: Saturn, Jupiter, Venus, etc... For instance, Saturn and Venus represent Lucifer. This was really the origin of the Occult, which inspired the famous Egyptian gods and goddesses, like Horus and Anubis. A few centuries following Exodus, Pharaoh Tutmosis IV discovered the Sphinx Stele tablet, which literally described Western monotheism (I don't know where in the cinnamon toast fuck it came from). CLEARLY, some weird shit went down in Egypt, and I really can't think of any other explanation outside of alien intervention.
After finally getting their shit together, Babylonians rallied behind King Solomon (AKA King David), who paved the way in establishing Israel. In the ensuing decades, Judaism was born (return of Enki/Yahweh), and the worship of "false idols" (Antichrists), like Moloch/Baal, was outlawed. As one could imagine, this didn't go over well with "traditionalists". Queen Sheba corrupted Solomon, leading to the division of Israel, the contamination of Judaism, and the re-emergence of Baalism. The centuries following this fragile period were when Ezra's Torah was written. It's unclear how much of it is an actual documentation of history, rather than an embezzlement of King Solomon's achievements. Taking advantage of a fractured Israel, Baalists began inbreeding and practicing their faith in secret. During the Second Temple Period in Judea, they masqueraded as devout Jews, and founded the Pharisees, which famously clashed with the Saducess (Hellenized sect of Judaism). Baalists deliberately claimed positions of authority within Synagogues, leading to much of the Rabbonic Priesthood being contaminated. They then used the threat of the growing Roman Empire to subvert their people through Talmudic teachings (ethnic nepotism), weaponizing them against outsiders. This is Biblically known as "The Synagogue of Satan".
As time went on, Rome began expanding at an incredible pace. The Romans set up proxy governments all over Europe and the Middle-East, subverting foreign citizens everywhere. Strangely though, the polytheistic Roman Empire (religion adopted through Hellenization) was highly tolerant of other cultures, often integrating foreign deities into its official faith. Note that Romans were also warriors, so death and bloodshed were commonplace to them. The Colosseum was literally a stadium where they watched criminals get brutally killed for entertainment. Needless to say, Baalists were in Heaven. Among the many faiths in ancient Rome was Saturnalia. This was practiced by the Cult of Saturn (orgies and human sacrifices), which worshipped "Venus's Bloodline" (lineage of Julius Ceasar and Cleopatra VII). Their god was Lucifer, as they believed he came from Venus, and planted the seeds of life on Earth. The Pharaohs of Egypt (originally ancient Celts) were thought to be descended from the original humans. The fact that Julius Ceasar (leader of Rome) got into Cleopatra's pants was quite the achievement, in their eyes. An important side-note is that Ceasar had his armies torch the Egyptian Library of Alexandria, which is rumored to have held tons of forgotten knowledge.
During this same time period, "Jesus of Nazareth" was born. I'm sure we ALL know the story, but there is an EXTREMELY controversial detail that history points to... Jesus allegedly never proclaimed himself to be the son of God, and may have not been crucified (this is believed among Jews and Muslims). Realize that the Bible has been altered COUNTLESS times to fit the goals of despots. Jesus might have been inspired by Apollonius of Tyana, a Gnostic philosopher with an very similar story. He still spread the word of God across the Roman Empire, but was just a man. The "son sacrifice and resurrection" myth dates all the way back to Ancient Egypt (noticing a trend?), so this isn't all that far-fetched. Jesus wasn't actually declared the the son of God until 325 A.D., by the Council of Nicaea. Note also that his initials match Julius Ceasar's. Similarly, Saint Peter and his inverted crucifixion is thought to be entirely fabricated by the Vatican.
Eventually, the Baalists (and other Pagans in the Roman Empire) merged with the Cult of Saturn, and together devised an insidious plot for world domination. This was the birth of the Cabal and the New World Order agenda. Once Rome fell to the Praetorian Guard, the cult took over and attempted to enslave the population FOUR separate times! Each time, they used monotheism as a catalyst, along with a totalitarian central banking system, forcing people to swear allegiance to one god (them). The population rejected their bullshit the first three times, but took a liking to Christianity. The Luciferians had the Vatican built (Pagan fortress) to act as a base of operations. Did you ever wonder where in the flying fuck Popes come from?? They were never a part of Abrahamic faiths before the Vatican was established. It's almost as if they declared themselves rulers, and had all dissenters mercilessly slaughtered. Oh, and "Holy Communion"? Based on a cannibalistic ritual. How very "Christian"...
The Vatican created Islam as an ethnic cleansing tool, to justify "Christian" imperialism, and the eradication of "infidels". Enter the Crusades... The Vatican's army, the Knights Templar, put nearly all of Europe under the boot of the "Holy Roman Empire" ("The Holy See"); all so a handful of unfathomably evil men could have all of the world's resources to themselves. In the Dark Ages, they worked tirelessly to undermine sovereign nations, using their "CIA", the Jesuits, and establishing the "Papal States" (territory ruled by 13 ancient bloodlines AKA Black Nobility). The Templars went on to establish Switzerland, and then expanded outward into the rest of Europe. They assisted the Papal bloodlines in building a malevolent banking apparatus across Europe. The banking Capitol moved from Florence, Italy, to Hamburg, Germany, and then to Amsterdam, Netherlands. As time went on, Paganism and nature-worship became popularized. Some of the Templars themselves converted, and practiced Hermeticism (Occult philosophy and Black Magick). It's believed that these rogue Templars worshipped Baphomet as a Satanic deity ("As above, so below.").
In light of the Vatican's rapid expansion, the famous Silk Road enabled new trade routes between Asia and Europe, leading to the rise of the Khazars. The Khazars started out as a relatively innocent Turkic tribe, based in the Eurasia Steppe. They acted as ambassadors between Asia and Europe, and dealt heavily with Radhanites (Jewish merchants). What's fascinating is that the Khazarian ruling class, based in their Capitol, Atil, consisted of Caucasians, which really drives home their geographical significance. In the sixth century, Khazarian Princess Tzitzak (or "Irene") actually married Constantine V, of the Byzantine Empire, putting her people under Roman jurisdiction. Decades later, under Kings Bulan and Obadiah, the Khazars were infiltrated by Jesuits, who forced them to convert to Judaism (not sure why Christianity wasn't chosen). Following turmoil between the Jewish and traditionalist Khazars, the City of Atil collapsed, the Khazars dispersed into Europe. Like the Templars, many Khazars became Pagans, and practiced Black Magick (Kabbalah), which involved summoning demons (aliens?), ritual sodomy (ffs...), necromancy, and other incantations. Pagans often questioned the illusionary nature of reality (perception?), and what is actually tangible.
Why in c/Conspiracies would you take it as certain that humans emerged .3mya? That assertion comes from a group of scientists making inferences differently than the last group of scientists. We're better off to say very little is certain that far back than to propose a narrative with great certainty, unless our narrative is taken on trust from people believed trustworthy. The point is that Yahweh has evidence of trustworthiness; Pleiadians are not trustworthy.
I'm not aware of ancient cultural narratives where the flood truly precedes the garden. I'm aware that people who hated the garden coming first inserted more echoic floods in before then, without historical or documentary evidence, and then in the echo chamber various faulty supports continued being inserted. I did say compare combatants' views and decide who is trusted.
Thoughts on Graham Hancock/Randall Carlson/Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis?
Those guys posit something, likely an asteroid impact at one of the poles, triggering a rapid melt of glaciers and thus a (worldwide) flood 12,000 years ago.
I take your comment about timelines to heart, but I’ve never seen compelling evidence that the general timeline on the emergence of anatomically modern humans is anything like what some people exegise from adding up the ages of adams line to get ~6000. There’s solid evidence of native/indigenous groups in the americas dating back 50,000+ years before you even get to the things like mechanical tool scrapes on mammoth bones dated to 130,000 years ago which is a more recent discovery but valid in my understanding. Where do you fall on the spectrum?
When we're talking origin of universe or origin of sentience we mean processes not now occurring, so there's not much right to use scientific uniformitarianism to assume it happened slow or fast. If other lines of evidence are correct, nuclear processes have slowed down, a supposition that resolves some discrepancies. There are a few very tactile yardsticks, like ice cores and tree rings and polonium halos, that give good history, but most others are just guesses thrown backwards through time without evidence that they hit any targets. When you're looking at 6k versus 100k (one order of magnitude, possibility of reconciliation) you don't need to argue like you do between 100k and 20 billion (five orders of magnitude, two different camps represented).
When we look at these guesses we find in particular that carbon-dating is highly varied even for identical samples and so I don't place much stock in 130k as more valid than another guess, while being wholly credulous that several lines of evidence do show human-dinosaur interaction at some point (the other forums seem to love St. George and the Dragon). Worldwide flood fits well with evidence of continental drift so long as we don't argue about timeframe of drift, and asteroid impact (plus underground water caverns now largely defunct) also fits well with that theory. Here I think the date of 12k ties to astronomical evidence from Egypt rather than ice cores, which give younger dates.
Most important is to get the strands of data right in solid narratives (Creator, Flood, giants), while seeking which sources give the most truthful narratives and using ordinary rules of comparing testimonies to judge which best match the data.
You know that annoying cliche “blah blah blah couldn’t possibly be a conspiracy, you’d need X amount of people to all go along with it!”
As we all know, compartmentalization solves that. Which is why the car factory tasked with make a steel insert for the Manhattan Project couldn’t leak that fact, because they didn’t know. BUT they could perform their job with what they knew.
This is why I’m OPEN to the idea of a massive conspiracy shaping what we perceive as “history”. I find it plausible enough that each sub discipline (paleo-Greco-archeology with a focus on pottery shards, pre-megalithic-hunter-forager cave art specialists, whatever, could all be “working” in their fields without ever putting the missing links together with their fellow hyper-specialists)
What I find harder to believe is the notion that even the “work” these people think they’ve been doing, and checking, and attempting to discredit their competitors for tenure, are all actually just writing what amounts to sensible gibberish.
That’s why I’m drawn to ideas like those of Hancock et al, which take the hyper specialized specks and fragments and unites them (instead of throwing them out) with the knowledge/wisdom of the ancients.