It's not hard to plant seeds, sure. But are you suggesting ancient humans were planting and cultivating seeds as a main means of sustenance? Because that's the only way you could imply meat wasn't important for them, and that's not really how being a hunter-gatherer worked.
I like to think my initial statement was intellectually honest and not condescending, though perhaps you read it otherwise. I still maintain meat was important to humans from an evolutionary perspective which is an accepted belief even by most vegans. The human brain would not have evolved the way it did without animal fats.
Clearly this conversation will go nowhere, but now know some people think taunting the ability of another person to survive is not a condescending stance to take in a debate, so at least I learned something.
It's not hard to plant seeds, sure. But are you suggesting ancient humans were planting and cultivating seeds as a main means of sustenance? Because that's the only way you could imply meat wasn't important for them, and that's not really how being a hunter-gatherer worked.
I like to think my initial statement was intellectually honest and not condescending, though perhaps you read it otherwise. I still maintain meat was important to humans from an evolutionary perspective which is an accepted belief even by most vegans. The human brain would not have evolved the way it did without animal fats.
Clearly this conversation will go nowhere, but now know some people think taunting the ability of another person to survive is not a condescending stance to take in a debate, so at least I learned something.
agreed
"main" by food volume, yes.
I like to think my statements were intellectually honest and not taunting, though perhaps you read it otherwise.