Statistics is not science. It is a part of science but in real science many different angles are being considered true and there is no 1, sacred truth. This Fauci creature is one of the worst. This man has nothing to do with science, he is a propaganda pawn.
They are debating it in the UK, Covid passports. Except it would have to go through the courts even if it was passed by parliament. I have faith in the judicial system. This vaccine has never had peer reviews. Outside of latent corruption. Things like; Death, side effects, efficacy, and also factors like those who cannot take it allergies and immune compromised and then human rights and morals. Corruption can make up bullshit adverts using non stop media. Until it becomes law, enough with these fallacies they are heresay. It would have to go through court to be binding. It hasn't. Until then it is an invasion of human rights. Sure there is nothing but bullshit media ad campaigns.
No other questions, it is not binding, made into law outside of otherwise current emergency powers citing fiction.
It has to go through court before they force vaccination to be able to engage in otherwise daily activities, or before they employ vaccine passports.
At the moment emergency powers have rushed a vaccine through. In their power, emergency forcing demand. But as soon as rights are questioned the vaccine goes through court. Especially when a percentage of the population cannot take it at all, many refuse too. Further the vaccine is both fatal and causes injuries. It hasn't been subject to peer review, non bias court case, prior to any launch because of the emergency power authorized. However forcing vaccination on the public who both refuse and further implementing it to step on human rights with more regulations like passports, now becomes a court case or becomes law. Full scrutiny is sooner adopted outside of the rampant corruption assuming the greater good. Literally some have and continue to line their pockets without any other thought.
Aside it is being filed as lawsuits already from both the injuries and deaths caused.
Speculation still. As a lot of power has rigged the need facilitating its usage where it has had virtually no independent scrutiny. Here in this press he is speaking out of turn on writing law to push the vaccine. Why would a court overturn sentencing because of vaccination? The same applies to a vaccine passport or forced inoculation.
Statistics is not science. It is a part of science but in real science many different angles are being considered true and there is no 1, sacred truth. This Fauci creature is one of the worst. This man has nothing to do with science, he is a propaganda pawn.
Why the hell is a snake oil salesman legislating on the supreme court. Not up to him.
Questions to keep you up at night indeed.
They are debating it in the UK, Covid passports. Except it would have to go through the courts even if it was passed by parliament. I have faith in the judicial system. This vaccine has never had peer reviews. Outside of latent corruption. Things like; Death, side effects, efficacy, and also factors like those who cannot take it allergies and immune compromised and then human rights and morals. Corruption can make up bullshit adverts using non stop media. Until it becomes law, enough with these fallacies they are heresay. It would have to go through court to be binding. It hasn't. Until then it is an invasion of human rights. Sure there is nothing but bullshit media ad campaigns.
No other questions, it is not binding, made into law outside of otherwise current emergency powers citing fiction.
What supreme court?
It has to go through court before they force vaccination to be able to engage in otherwise daily activities, or before they employ vaccine passports.
At the moment emergency powers have rushed a vaccine through. In their power, emergency forcing demand. But as soon as rights are questioned the vaccine goes through court. Especially when a percentage of the population cannot take it at all, many refuse too. Further the vaccine is both fatal and causes injuries. It hasn't been subject to peer review, non bias court case, prior to any launch because of the emergency power authorized. However forcing vaccination on the public who both refuse and further implementing it to step on human rights with more regulations like passports, now becomes a court case or becomes law. Full scrutiny is sooner adopted outside of the rampant corruption assuming the greater good. Literally some have and continue to line their pockets without any other thought.
Aside it is being filed as lawsuits already from both the injuries and deaths caused.
Speculation still. As a lot of power has rigged the need facilitating its usage where it has had virtually no independent scrutiny. Here in this press he is speaking out of turn on writing law to push the vaccine. Why would a court overturn sentencing because of vaccination? The same applies to a vaccine passport or forced inoculation.
You have human rights. These can say no. There is a percentage of both death and injury from it. You have the absolute right to refuse.
DUMBASS. We don't live in China.
Aside a huge percentage cannot take it. Under 16s, pregnancy, possibly trannies, auto immune disorders, and allergies.
Why should you? Out of fear. Yawn. It isn't law. Let me know when it is.
What about the people who got covid and lived? Does the immune system work different or something?
=)