There's no point in attempting to understand the grand scheme, or rather it is counterproductive, as you only have access to one extremely small piece of the whole from your limited perspective.
Work with what you've got, or drive yourself mad trying to hold the entire universe in a teaspoon.
you only have access to one extremely small piece of the whole from your limited perspective.
What if you are ONE within ALL; a potential within a potentiality?
What if ONE perceives ALL information, but ONEs comprehension of what ALL means is defined by ONEs free will of choice to either adhere or ignore ALL as the source of ALL information?
What if ALL reality can be ignored for belief based fiction, and what if that ignorance based belief, corrupts ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived information?
Coincidentally; the few control the many with lies; the many consent to lies by believing them.
Solips-ISM and Non-Dual-ISM...it's not about WHAT one believes; but THAT one believes.
It's the -ism that represents the offered contract of belief, that when consented to, creates the conflict between believers vs non-believers. Solus and ipse (alone and self) refer to ONEs choice to ignore adherence of self sustenance (reality), which then creates the belief based duality (fiction) aka ignorance of reality.
The difference is within the sales pitch to get ONE to consent to the same contract of belief (ignorance of self).
You're trying way too hard to be deep.
There's no point in attempting to understand the grand scheme, or rather it is counterproductive, as you only have access to one extremely small piece of the whole from your limited perspective.
Work with what you've got, or drive yourself mad trying to hold the entire universe in a teaspoon.
you only have access to one extremely small piece of the whole from your limited perspective.
What if you are ONE within ALL; a potential within a potentiality?
What if ONE perceives ALL information, but ONEs comprehension of what ALL means is defined by ONEs free will of choice to either adhere or ignore ALL as the source of ALL information?
What if ALL reality can be ignored for belief based fiction, and what if that ignorance based belief, corrupts ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived information?
Coincidentally; the few control the many with lies; the many consent to lies by believing them.
Solips-ISM and Non-Dual-ISM...it's not about WHAT one believes; but THAT one believes.
It's the -ism that represents the offered contract of belief, that when consented to, creates the conflict between believers vs non-believers. Solus and ipse (alone and self) refer to ONEs choice to ignore adherence of self sustenance (reality), which then creates the belief based duality (fiction) aka ignorance of reality.
The difference is within the sales pitch to get ONE to consent to the same contract of belief (ignorance of self).