So, I want to contribute to the public consultation about the necessity of digital identities as presented by the UK government.
Can we all squeeze our ridge brains and come up with arguments against the necessity of digital identities please?
It is given that the government(s) as a given has covered the areas of privacy/data protection, fraud, inclusivity of services and security therefore more (or stronger on the previous ones) arguments are required.
Please let's all come together to make a solid argument against the need of digital identities.
Here's the porposal if interested to read the arguments for https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-framework/the-uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-framework
We have until 12pm on Thursday 11 March 2021
All of WW2 is a pretty good argument against "Papers Please !"
But they will say that public health supersedes that !
There is always a bullshit excuse.
The science doesn't support:
lockdowns
forced vaccinations as a solution to anything
the existence of SARSCOV2 in humans
PCR tests as being anywhere near "accurate"