5G is as safe/unsafe as 3G/4G. That's all. If you are not concerned about health issues from your loved smartphone right now, you have absolutely no reasons to be concerned about 5G health issues.
5G have two bands - FR1 and FR2.
FR1 is same as 3G/4G. The difference is only in more advanced modulation for higher bandwidth. And power density is even lower, than 3G/4G one.
FR2 is a 20-50GHz band, same as microwave sensors on the automatic doors at every supermarket, police radars to measure cars speed, etc. You meet that band in your everyday life for a long time. It's too late to worry about health issues. FR2 band is developed for short-range high bandwidth links, say inside malls or other buildings. It is mostly useless outside, because even sligtest fog or rain will effectively lower quality of signal propagation. And that band have very low penetration into any conductive object, like human body. It just can't pass deeper than your skin due to high frequency. It named "skin effect".
Dumbest thing is rumors about using 60Hz for 5G. Since it is oxygen resonance frequency, it will fade out in atmosphere immidiately, within meters from antenna. Oxygen will just work as a shield, eating all the power you transmit. The only effect you get is just slighly warmer air around antenna. It's like an attempt to use FM transmission under water. Interesting that 60Hz frequency is used in satellite-to-satellite links meant to be uninterceptable from Earth surface, because atmosphere works like strong impenetrable shield for that frequency.
5G controvercy is solely about higher bandwidth for total surveillance from every electronic gadget. That is the main and solid conspiracy about 5G all that "health danger" crap designed to distract from. Current 3G/4G bandwidth is more than enough to cover all modern needs for mobile internet and everything. And future ones too. But if you wish to install a microphone and camera in every fridge and teapot, you will need much more bandwidth to stream all that surveillance data. And here comes 5G. That is the only reason for it.
Total surveillance is the thing you should be angry about. This is the real concern, that could be seriously accepted by every sane person. However, that solid conspiracy is totally buried under all that insane "health" crap. If you take a look at what's going on about 5G, you will find that it is MSM who heavily push news about "crasy 5G coronavirus conspiracies" effectively silencing surveillance purposes of 5G.
5G is as safe/unsafe as 3G/4G. That's all. If you are not concerned about health issues from your loved smartphone right now, you have absolutely no reasons to be concerned about 5G health issues.
5G have two bands - FR1 and FR2.
FR1 is same as 3G/4G. The difference is only in more advanced modulation for higher bandwidth. And power density is even lower, than 3G/4G one.
FR2 is a 20-50GHz band, same as microwave sensors on the automatic doors at every supermarket, police radars to measure cars speed, etc. You meet that band in your everyday life for a long time. It's too late to worry about health issues. FR2 band is developed for short-range high bandwidth links, say inside malls or other buildings. It is mostly useless outside, because even sligtest fog or rain will effectively lower quality of signal propagation. And that band have very low penetration into any conductive object, like human body. It just can't pass deeper than your skin due to high frequency. It named "skin effect".
Dumbest thing is rumors about using 60Hz for 5G. Since it is oxygen resonance frequency, it will fade out in atmosphere immidiately, within meters from antenna. Oxygen will just work as a shield, eating all the power you transmit. The only effect you get is just slighly warmer air around antenna. It's like an attempt to use FM transmission under water. Interesting that 60Hz frequency is used in satellite-to-satellite links meant to be uninterceptable from Earth surface, because atmosphere works like strong impenetrable shield for that frequency.
5G controvercy is solely about higher bandwidth for total surveillance from every electronic gadget. That is the main and solid conspiracy about 5G all that "health danger" crap designed to distract from. Current 3G/4G bandwidth is more than enough to cover all modern needs for mobile internet and everything. And future ones too. But if you wish to install a microphone and camera in every fridge and teapot, you will need much more bandwidth to stream all that surveillance data. And here comes 5G. That is the only reason for it.
Total surveillance is the thing you should be angry about. This is the real concern, that could be seriously accepted by every sane person. However, that solid conspiracy is totally buried under all that insane "health" crap. If you take a look at what's going on about 5G, you will find that it is MSM who heavily push news about "crasy 5G coronavirus conspiracies" effectively silencing surveillance purposes of 5G.