In 1936, Chaim Weizmann (who decided not to attend the conference) declared that "the world seemed to be divided into two parts – those places where the Jews could not live and those where they could not enter."
The Australian delegate T. W. White noted: "as we have no real racial problem, we are not desirous of importing one".
The only countries willing to accept a large number of Jews were the Dominican Republic, which offered to accept up to 100,000 refugees on generous terms, and later Costa Rica.
This happened during a conference in 1938, before the Holocaust started up in 1941.
If international finance Jewry inside and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, the result will be not the Bolshevization of the earth and thereby the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.
It seems like he's saying there is a class of Jews (international finance/bankers) who aim to carry out Bolshevik style revolutions in existing nations and that this would lead to annihilation of the Jews in Europe. Notice he did not say annihilation of Jews in Germany. Nor did he say the Germans will annihilate Jews. He meant Europe will annihilate them. The Europe who would not accept the Jewish immigrants.
These words were similar to comments that Hitler had previously made to foreign politicians in private meetings after the Kristallnacht pogrom in November 1938. The speech was made in the context of Nazi attempts to increase Jewish emigration from Germany, before the outbreak of World War II in September 1939.
They took many steps to deport Jews rather than kill them. Is that not an attempt to save their lives?
Threatening international bankers not to start a world war.
Think about it by today's standards.
Imagine if international Jewish bankers started a world war and several nations were able to prove they did it.
What happen next? Jews would be blamed en masse, witch hunted and lynched by the populace of any and every nation suffering from the war.
So yeah, Hitler tried to protect the Jews of Europe, by telling the very big bad ones to cease and desist.
What you don't seem to be picking up here is my overall respect for people and life on both sides of the fence. I can respect the Germans as much as the Jews. No need to hate people who are not part of any conspiracy to do harm to others.
This happened during a conference in 1938, before the Holocaust started up in 1941.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89vian_Conference
Yes, I know. But that has nothing to do with Hitler trying to "protect the Jews" or whatever ludicrous theory you're trying to push.
Have a look at this statement Hitler made:
It seems like he's saying there is a class of Jews (international finance/bankers) who aim to carry out Bolshevik style revolutions in existing nations and that this would lead to annihilation of the Jews in Europe. Notice he did not say annihilation of Jews in Germany. Nor did he say the Germans will annihilate Jews. He meant Europe will annihilate them. The Europe who would not accept the Jewish immigrants.
They took many steps to deport Jews rather than kill them. Is that not an attempt to save their lives?
No, thats what's called a "threat."
Threatening international bankers not to start a world war.
Think about it by today's standards.
Imagine if international Jewish bankers started a world war and several nations were able to prove they did it.
What happen next? Jews would be blamed en masse, witch hunted and lynched by the populace of any and every nation suffering from the war.
So yeah, Hitler tried to protect the Jews of Europe, by telling the very big bad ones to cease and desist.
What you don't seem to be picking up here is my overall respect for people and life on both sides of the fence. I can respect the Germans as much as the Jews. No need to hate people who are not part of any conspiracy to do harm to others.