No, since entropy represents the "randomness of disorder". Motion itself stands for the natural order, and motion creates momentum aka resistance to motion, which represents temporary chaos mimicking (through resonance) the natural order aka the flow of information aka motion.
There is no randomness within motion; everything within motion is the consequence of an action set into motion. What defines motion? The movement from a beginning towards an end, which for us represent inception till death.
all information is in a constant progress towards decay
Yes, but if that means all existence is constantly changing, then why do they trick us to believe in past, present and future (time), when we are always within the ever changing moment? Also, how can we believe (an affixed thought) within a reality based on constant change?
That last question regarding inspiration sounds a little religious to me. I attempt to stay within the context of what reality I can affect.
Well then lets disprove all religions, shall we? Can ONE create without having inspiration from ALL that already exists first? Can you create without the inspiration you get from ALL that already exists? Can anyONE create without the inspiration from ALL that already exists?
Is this motion related to the Entropy concept?
No, since entropy represents the "randomness of disorder". Motion itself stands for the natural order, and motion creates momentum aka resistance to motion, which represents temporary chaos mimicking (through resonance) the natural order aka the flow of information aka motion.
There is no randomness within motion; everything within motion is the consequence of an action set into motion. What defines motion? The movement from a beginning towards an end, which for us represent inception till death.
all information is in a constant progress towards decay
Yes, but if that means all existence is constantly changing, then why do they trick us to believe in past, present and future (time), when we are always within the ever changing moment? Also, how can we believe (an affixed thought) within a reality based on constant change?
That last question regarding inspiration sounds a little religious to me. I attempt to stay within the context of what reality I can affect.
Well then lets disprove all religions, shall we? Can ONE create without having inspiration from ALL that already exists first? Can you create without the inspiration you get from ALL that already exists? Can anyONE create without the inspiration from ALL that already exists?