Evidence wasn't even allowed to be presented in over 50 court cases. If you are unaware, the majority of these judges were installed by the Soros Open Society foundation.
Why did none of Trump's lawyers argue election fraud in ANY CASE and when asked about it specifically IN COURT stated that they did not argue that fraud occurred.
You know, the thing, someone would do when claiming that fraud occurred.
Let's say someone defrauded you of 1000$ and you sue him but in the filing you never mention anything about 1000$ or that the guy committed fraud, would anyone think that the case is about you being defrauded of 1000$?
And then in the court case, when the judge asks you if you are arguing that the guy defrauded you you specifically state that this was not the case.
And why would you NOT sue the guy for fraud anyway if you spent WEEKS telling everyone you know that you had MOUNTAINS of evidence for the fraud?
In case anyone doesn't know about this site: https://hereistheevidence.com/
Well there it is.
Why did none of Trump's lawyers argue election fraud in court if it is all so obvious?
Evidence wasn't even allowed to be presented in over 50 court cases. If you are unaware, the majority of these judges were installed by the Soros Open Society foundation.
Why did none of Trump's lawyers argue election fraud in ANY CASE and when asked about it specifically IN COURT stated that they did not argue that fraud occurred.
You know, the thing, someone would do when claiming that fraud occurred.
Let's say someone defrauded you of 1000$ and you sue him but in the filing you never mention anything about 1000$ or that the guy committed fraud, would anyone think that the case is about you being defrauded of 1000$?
And then in the court case, when the judge asks you if you are arguing that the guy defrauded you you specifically state that this was not the case.
And why would you NOT sue the guy for fraud anyway if you spent WEEKS telling everyone you know that you had MOUNTAINS of evidence for the fraud?