Not sure about the rest of them, but some interesting facts about Breitbart:
Two weeks before he died he had dinner at Bill Ayers house.
He died early on March 1, 2012, a few minutes after the NDAA came into effect which allowed for the assassination of American citizens deemed "terrorists".
his beef with John Podesta bears mentioning too. I think Breitbart knew about the pedophilia and the human trafficking. It's pretty clear that Podesta is one of the left's biggest political fixers and probably had Scalia murdered (maybe also gave the order for Seth Rich - remember his "I'm all for making an example of the leaker" email) so it's not out of the question he arranged to take out Breitbart too.
I don't know about the other names here, I've seen the speculation but is there anything to it?
breitbart was 100% whacked even relatively mainstream outlets and basic bitch conservatives were suspicious of that one
guy was 43 and died of "natural causes" and then the coroner died
now the outlet he founded has been co-opted to become another controlled opposition media mouthpiece
I'm not really sure if this twitter account is an actual ITK or just disseminating digs that have been done in the past few years by various anons across conspiracy theory, pizzagate, Q communities etc... I'd lean toward that explanation. chester bennington / pedosta is a fucking weird rabbit hole though
yeah it really is uncanny how similar they look, and given some of the themes you can see sort of lurking in the imagery of Linkin Park's music videos I can see why there's a lot of speculation
In that tweet he wasn't accusing Podesta of any crimes. He was accusing Podesta of defending ACORN. The tweet was also over a year before his death.
Conservative activists Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe pretended to be pimps with underage girls and went to ACORN offices asking for tax advice. They made undercover videos which were heavily edited to make the ACORN employees look guilty. For example, they omitted the parts where the employees pointed out that what they were doing was illegal.
How prog-guru John Podesta isn't household name as world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer defending unspeakable dregs escapes me.
that he is accusing Podesta of defending ACORN? That's one I haven't heard before. You need to make the connection more explicit. I don't recall ACORN ever being accused of underage sex slavery or anything of the sort.
with that 2nd tweet I see what you're getting at, I do agree he's talking about Podesta defending ACORN against the Okeefe string operation there. However, the other tweet is almost a year later and it isn't clear to me it's related. "defending unspeakable dregs" gives a much darker impression, why would ACORN be unspeakable dregs? what is unspeakable about it?
yeah, I think he uses the phrase to make an implication about Podesta. I don't think Breitbart honestly believed that ACORN was involved in underaged sex slavery or any other sort of "unspeakable dregs." He knew that Okeefe was pretending to be a pimp, the irony in it is that Podesta actually is one. That's what the tweets get at. I still don't see how your theory explains the second tweet.
Mechanically speaking the car he died in was all analog. Harder to Hastings a car with so little electronics. It was the last of its kind for a reason, power like that needs a traction control computer tbh
If you read the caption under his photo you would know - and it was well rumored before his death - that he was going to expose HRC because of what he found out doing relief aid to Haiti.
This continues to be one of the absolute dumbest fucking theories around. The parasties in the extended Q universe have absolutely no shame. Their first impulse upon hearing that a celebrity died is to immediately absorb them into their pathetic narrative, baselessly claiming that the deceased was "just about to reveal the deep state" or "was working on a documentary about elite pedophiles."
If someone takes the time to make an acct and post here they should certainly be willing to at least entertain conspiracy theories.
The fact that so many trolls have showed up spewing vitriol on every thread leads me to believe many of these theories are over the target. I'm sure I'm not alone. Seems that would be the exact opposite effect these trolls are hoping for which leads me to believe they aren't very bright. Or they're being paid by morons. Or they're mentally ill.
The best shills don’t act so obvious, if they’re losing a debate they’ll hide before looking dumber than they already do and never admit to all their alts, like this idiot with the musical naming scheme lol.
That’s a small amount of them though, I think most are just useful idiots as the russians would call them. Morons who uncritically regurgitate what they see on the party news networks. And when one of those morons finds out about conspiracies, they’ve found a whole new batch of people to “illuminate” with their “knowledge”
What of I told you that you could entertain this idea, and after looking into it realize there's tons of disinfo (like the documentary none of them were actually associated with) and figured out it smelled like bullshit?
So quick to claim shill whenever people are questioned or when people see things differently. Or when they have left wing views. Or when they aren't in lockstep with the former Trump admin. Or when you ask for sources. Shill shill shill.
Not sure about the rest of them, but some interesting facts about Breitbart:
Two weeks before he died he had dinner at Bill Ayers house.
He died early on March 1, 2012, a few minutes after the NDAA came into effect which allowed for the assassination of American citizens deemed "terrorists".
Two weeks after that, Ayers called him a A Grinning Bomb Thrower Of The Radical Right
his beef with John Podesta bears mentioning too. I think Breitbart knew about the pedophilia and the human trafficking. It's pretty clear that Podesta is one of the left's biggest political fixers and probably had Scalia murdered (maybe also gave the order for Seth Rich - remember his "I'm all for making an example of the leaker" email) so it's not out of the question he arranged to take out Breitbart too.
I don't know about the other names here, I've seen the speculation but is there anything to it?
breitbart was 100% whacked even relatively mainstream outlets and basic bitch conservatives were suspicious of that one
guy was 43 and died of "natural causes" and then the coroner died
now the outlet he founded has been co-opted to become another controlled opposition media mouthpiece
I'm not really sure if this twitter account is an actual ITK or just disseminating digs that have been done in the past few years by various anons across conspiracy theory, pizzagate, Q communities etc... I'd lean toward that explanation. chester bennington / pedosta is a fucking weird rabbit hole though
yeah it really is uncanny how similar they look, and given some of the themes you can see sort of lurking in the imagery of Linkin Park's music videos I can see why there's a lot of speculation
In that tweet he wasn't accusing Podesta of any crimes. He was accusing Podesta of defending ACORN. The tweet was also over a year before his death.
Conservative activists Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe pretended to be pimps with underage girls and went to ACORN offices asking for tax advice. They made undercover videos which were heavily edited to make the ACORN employees look guilty. For example, they omitted the parts where the employees pointed out that what they were doing was illegal.
At least one ACORN employee reported the "pimps" to police.
Breitbart is criticizing Podesta for defending ACORN. He is in no way saying that Podesta himself was engaged in an underage sex slave operation.
How do you conclude from
that he is accusing Podesta of defending ACORN? That's one I haven't heard before. You need to make the connection more explicit. I don't recall ACORN ever being accused of underage sex slavery or anything of the sort.
He tweeted about it quite a bit. Here's another one.
with that 2nd tweet I see what you're getting at, I do agree he's talking about Podesta defending ACORN against the Okeefe string operation there. However, the other tweet is almost a year later and it isn't clear to me it's related. "defending unspeakable dregs" gives a much darker impression, why would ACORN be unspeakable dregs? what is unspeakable about it?
He uses the phrase underage sex slave in both tweets. Aren't people who support underage sex slavery unspeakable dregs?
yeah, I think he uses the phrase to make an implication about Podesta. I don't think Breitbart honestly believed that ACORN was involved in underaged sex slavery or any other sort of "unspeakable dregs." He knew that Okeefe was pretending to be a pimp, the irony in it is that Podesta actually is one. That's what the tweets get at. I still don't see how your theory explains the second tweet.
Nope.
https://sports.yahoo.com/bizarre-rumors-conspiracy-theories-claim-045340117.html
How does paul walker tie into this?-- Quite the stretch to just "CLAIM" he knew of HRC'S crime etc and was going to come forward.
Another LARP I suppose?
Mechanically speaking the car he died in was all analog. Harder to Hastings a car with so little electronics. It was the last of its kind for a reason, power like that needs a traction control computer tbh
If you read the caption under his photo you would know - and it was well rumored before his death - that he was going to expose HRC because of what he found out doing relief aid to Haiti.
Thats such a broad claim that can't be backed up.
I can make some fancy pictures with text beneath and claim someone said something.
Where is he saying this on camera etc?
Unlike chester and others.. They were actually going after human trafficking etc.
“ Thats such a broad claim that can't be backed up.”
I mean you are on a conspiracy theory website, sooo......
yes ofcourse.. but we have to stop painting "CONSPIRACY" on every ugly fat pig that strolls along.
So what you're saying is that it's make believe?
This continues to be one of the absolute dumbest fucking theories around. The parasties in the extended Q universe have absolutely no shame. Their first impulse upon hearing that a celebrity died is to immediately absorb them into their pathetic narrative, baselessly claiming that the deceased was "just about to reveal the deep state" or "was working on a documentary about elite pedophiles."
Utter horseshit with zero proof to back it up.
I did laugh at "extended Q universe"
When do we get the Q Cinematic Universe?
Thoughts on Avicii topshill?
A drug addict who was committing a slow suicide? Wait, don't tell me -- he was about to expose the deep state too???
Target locked
Yeah, too bad you’re shooting blanks.
Wanna know how I know you’re a shill? Your posts
If someone takes the time to make an acct and post here they should certainly be willing to at least entertain conspiracy theories.
The fact that so many trolls have showed up spewing vitriol on every thread leads me to believe many of these theories are over the target. I'm sure I'm not alone. Seems that would be the exact opposite effect these trolls are hoping for which leads me to believe they aren't very bright. Or they're being paid by morons. Or they're mentally ill.
It's baffling.
The best shills don’t act so obvious, if they’re losing a debate they’ll hide before looking dumber than they already do and never admit to all their alts, like this idiot with the musical naming scheme lol.
That’s a small amount of them though, I think most are just useful idiots as the russians would call them. Morons who uncritically regurgitate what they see on the party news networks. And when one of those morons finds out about conspiracies, they’ve found a whole new batch of people to “illuminate” with their “knowledge”
What of I told you that you could entertain this idea, and after looking into it realize there's tons of disinfo (like the documentary none of them were actually associated with) and figured out it smelled like bullshit?
So quick to claim shill whenever people are questioned or when people see things differently. Or when they have left wing views. Or when they aren't in lockstep with the former Trump admin. Or when you ask for sources. Shill shill shill.
I’m still waiting for you to show me the “disinformation” I post. I didn’t forget.
Oh sorry, didn't realize that being interested in conspiracy theories meant I had to believe every crock of shit that someone lays on me.