The owner of this telegram was banned from twitter yesterday...interestingly he retweeted a copy of our "deep fake presidency" list shortly before his twitter ban.
This is an extremely specific (and disturbing) claim. Hard to know what's what these days, which may indeed be part of the plan to confuse and bewilder.
I always thought Trump chose him as his own kind of insurance policy because if the let actually took him out they would get an actual right wing Christian in charge of the country.
But in retrospect he was probably permitted in the VP role because he was hardline deep state and was involved in all manner of child rapes and murders, so if they had to take Trump out, they would have someone who is in the fold to take over. It explains why he ended up being Brutus.
That's an insane claim if true. It's too bold of a claim for me to believe without video evidence confirmation from people. Whistleblowers aren't going to cut it for me unless there's a lot of them...
This is one of the ones we'll have to wait on I suspect...
Always this short twitter messages with big accusations and the claim there is bulletproof evidence but the evidence is hold back by [xxx].
I dont say no way this is imposible, but i do say if you make big accusations then the burden of proof lies on you.
If you dont provide proof, such an accusation is just a tactical move to defame someone or (in this case more likly) to build up an alternative narrative.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/305th_Military_Intelligence_Battalion_(United_States)
The 305th Military Intelligence Battalion is part of the United States Army 's 111th Military Intelligence Brigade located at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. It consists of three companies: A-Alpha Company, B-Bravo Company, and C-Charlie Company.
It is also known as "the Kraken".
dude relax. It's literally one thread. These type of histrionics are the problem with reddit, not conspiracy speculation. Check the COVID sticky for some good info.
The accusations in the tweet/telegram does not have any proof. So for now its just a wild accusation without any value. All it does is pushing a narrative.
This comment does the same, pushing a narrative.
If mods think its okey to ban such a comment, but its also okey to post a telegram that basically does the same - pushing an unprooven narrative then this is really not a place for free speech.
It's clear that the narrative in the telegram is popular to the mod/this side, while this narrative is not popular. But if not the quality of a message, but the narrative determines if you get banned on this side then tell me, what is the difference between this site and mainstream social media with their factcheckers, other then the narrative?
The owner of this telegram was banned from twitter yesterday...interestingly he retweeted a copy of our "deep fake presidency" list shortly before his twitter ban.
This is an extremely specific (and disturbing) claim. Hard to know what's what these days, which may indeed be part of the plan to confuse and bewilder.
It is quite often both. Can we stop this false conflation of conspiracy = false?
It is a misuse of the word. People keep using the word "conspiracy" when the word they are wishing to use is "theory".
It conflates, and confuses their intended message.
But it happens so often that I think it must be intentional.
People just don't understand what the word means anymore. It's so bad, not only have I heard others do it, I've actually done it myself in real life.
Why is a good example now: https://nitter.net/qfrogman5326q/status/1354656835786174464#m
The only thing intentional about it, is the psyop that is trying to discredit people using the term.
What is that about? Q? Q predicted the future 500 times?
I always thought Trump chose him as his own kind of insurance policy because if the let actually took him out they would get an actual right wing Christian in charge of the country.
But in retrospect he was probably permitted in the VP role because he was hardline deep state and was involved in all manner of child rapes and murders, so if they had to take Trump out, they would have someone who is in the fold to take over. It explains why he ended up being Brutus.
That's an insane claim if true. It's too bold of a claim for me to believe without video evidence confirmation from people. Whistleblowers aren't going to cut it for me unless there's a lot of them... This is one of the ones we'll have to wait on I suspect...
Always this short twitter messages with big accusations and the claim there is bulletproof evidence but the evidence is hold back by [xxx].
I dont say no way this is imposible, but i do say if you make big accusations then the burden of proof lies on you.
If you dont provide proof, such an accusation is just a tactical move to defame someone or (in this case more likly) to build up an alternative narrative.
Don shipley come get your man
Do we know who this poster is or what is the 305th?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/305th_Military_Intelligence_Battalion_(United_States) The 305th Military Intelligence Battalion is part of the United States Army 's 111th Military Intelligence Brigade located at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. It consists of three companies: A-Alpha Company, B-Bravo Company, and C-Charlie Company. It is also known as "the Kraken".
What's the claim...it's a dead link.
You 7 days ago:
Oh you're a concern troll, duly noted.
dude relax. It's literally one thread. These type of histrionics are the problem with reddit, not conspiracy speculation. Check the COVID sticky for some good info.
So Trump has another very close to to Epstein then! The evidence is adding up!
EDIT: Banned for this comment? Really? With a message of concern troll?
The accusations in the tweet/telegram does not have any proof. So for now its just a wild accusation without any value. All it does is pushing a narrative.
This comment does the same, pushing a narrative.
If mods think its okey to ban such a comment, but its also okey to post a telegram that basically does the same - pushing an unprooven narrative then this is really not a place for free speech.
It's clear that the narrative in the telegram is popular to the mod/this side, while this narrative is not popular. But if not the quality of a message, but the narrative determines if you get banned on this side then tell me, what is the difference between this site and mainstream social media with their factcheckers, other then the narrative?
Give me a fucking break.