The accusations in the tweet/telegram does not have any proof. So for now its just a wild accusation without any value. All it does is pushing a narrative.
This comment does the same, pushing a narrative.
If mods think its okey to ban such a comment, but its also okey to post a telegram that basically does the same - pushing an unprooven narrative then this is really not a place for free speech.
It's clear that the narrative in the telegram is popular to the mod/this side, while this narrative is not popular. But if not the quality of a message, but the narrative determines if you get banned on this side then tell me, what is the difference between this site and mainstream social media with their factcheckers, other then the narrative?
So Trump has another very close to to Epstein then! The evidence is adding up!
EDIT: Banned for this comment? Really? With a message of concern troll?
The accusations in the tweet/telegram does not have any proof. So for now its just a wild accusation without any value. All it does is pushing a narrative.
This comment does the same, pushing a narrative.
If mods think its okey to ban such a comment, but its also okey to post a telegram that basically does the same - pushing an unprooven narrative then this is really not a place for free speech.
It's clear that the narrative in the telegram is popular to the mod/this side, while this narrative is not popular. But if not the quality of a message, but the narrative determines if you get banned on this side then tell me, what is the difference between this site and mainstream social media with their factcheckers, other then the narrative?